1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 6 of 6
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    BLAAA303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Last On
    02-02-2020 @ 03:22 AM
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    27
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    12:30 PM

    No1 Mk 3 H (not HT But poses a Question about my HT)

    Good evening all (here in Australiaicon),

    I'm on night shift so have time on my hands to troll the web and pester you Knowledge banks with Newbie Questions (I have searched "H" rifles with the search function also to no avail)

    I came across the following Web page and its triggered a question pertaining to my own HT rifle and its history..

    Now I've spoken with Ian S(an amazingly pleasant and helpful man) via email and emailed him pics of my rifle and mentioned its having volley sights he informed me its not uncommon as some Civi target rifles were handed in to the cause and converted.

    However after seeing this page and pic (as long as the info is correct) would it be plausible that this is how my rifle potentially started life or was this "H" Treatment reserved only for No1 Mk3* rifles as noted on the page? (My HT is a 1916)

    Also in comparison to my HT alot of the rifles im seeing appear to be in far better states of FTR to the point of being almost new looking?

    The stock is Modified and notched identically to mine (is this a factory thing? as i have noticed a couple of Rifles with similiar stock modicications and all look the same and not DIY? or is this to accommodate the standard factory issue Volley sights on older rifles?) on the Left hand side of the receiver and still appears to have a longer screw? in the trigger guard and parkerized the same as the rest of the rifle.
    If this is plausible is there any possible way to track it down? or am i grasping at straws here?



    Also what is with the little Lug on the picture of the rifle in the link below at the rear of the nose cone?

    LINK TO PAGE In question >>>>> http://www.firearms.net.au/military/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=81&Itemid=145




    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by BLAAA303; 10-27-2017 at 08:05 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. VIDEO: X-ray-ted movie! Glamour poses of skeletons
    By Badger in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-14-2012, 11:19 AM
  2. Question about a question mark
    By Demo in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-12-2011, 05:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts