1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: T less t's

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #20
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,058
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    11:32 AM
    The only rule I know of is that we don't know why they seem to represent almost every year and maker, in particular early Savages. I had one that was a pristine 1944 N322-- M47C. Any good reason for that not to be converted? None that I could see. My best guess would be they got ahead of themselves at some points, perhaps when the supply of brackets fell off due to ?? and the extra were set aside and never caught up with again. It's been said that things like solid forsight blocks led to rifles being rejected, but why would you convert a rifle then reject it when you could see very easily at the beginning what type of foresight block it had?

    Bear in mind that we figured out roughly what H&H produced and it wasn't a lot before 1944. The Canadians didn't get their full stock of No.4(T)s until around early 1944 IIRC. The supply of telescopes far, far outstripped the conversion work based on serial numbers and dates of scopes.
    Last edited by Surpmil; 10-31-2017 at 11:26 PM.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts