-
Advisory Panel
Swap between Buffington and ramp backsights?
OK Trapdoor fans, don't scream! This is a serious question: I would like to buy a Trapdoor, with the Buffington sight, as they quite simply outshoot most other military BP cartridge rifles, especially with aged eyeballs. But some competitions insist on open sights and do not permit rifles with Buffington sights to compete in the military class. The answer would be to buy a Buffington trapdoor and swap the backsight temporarily as needed. But this is only realistic if the swap is a simple screw off/screw on alteration.
So: do the two types of backsight have the same fixing hole spacing, or would the ramp backsight have to be altered to fit in place of the Buffington?
(I know that it doesn't work the other way around, because of the notch in the barrel band.)
For those who are worried by this idea: my rifles are tools, mostly hard-used tools, not museum showpieces.
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
01-11-2018 04:31 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Contributing Member
IIRC the spacing and hole size are the same for all of the models of 'trapdoor' Springfield rifle sights. The screws may be of different length and head size.
-
Thank You to Tom in N.J. For This Useful Post:
-
-
Advisory Panel
The rear sight hole spacing, location relative to receiver, and threading are IDENTICAL for ALL .45 caliber trapdoors, period. The screws do change, and the lower band is different as to top profile. However, all of the components are readily available at a reasonable price, and may be swapped in less time than in took me to type this. So, "no worries"!
-
Thank You to Dick Hosmer For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
Thanks for the answers. So now all I have to do is find an affordable Trapdoor in good shooting condition. That might take a while...
-
-
Legacy Member
Patrick - Some of the 1873 Springfield rear-sight screws are of the "un-slotted" type. These are trickier to remove than the later screws, with screw-driver slots.
Last edited by butlersrangers; 01-12-2018 at 12:07 AM.
-
-
Advisory Panel
ALL of the "ramp" type sights (M1873, M1877, M1879) were originally shipped from the Armory with slotless screws, except for the long-range rifles which had a slightly different (more pronounced dome) form to the head. Any other such sights now found with slotted screws had them changed - most by sources unknown. The Buffington was the only TD sight originally issued with slotted screws. A number of slotted screws on ramp sights will show signs off being hand-slotted. Slotless screws offered for sale today frequently have little stab marks at the edge where they were grabbed with a sharp-edged tool to extract them in a hurry, or where the preferred collet tool proved ineffective, when replacing sights en masse.
Last edited by Dick Hosmer; 01-12-2018 at 10:40 AM.
Reason: Clarification
-
Thank You to Dick Hosmer For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
What a strange idea! Slotless screws! I cannot think of another example, and can only surmise that someone thought it was a clever trick to prevent non-armory personnel from removing the sights. Like the "reversed" screw heads on the Enfield No. 4 foresight, which, as Peter Laidler informs us, were often enough replaced with normal screws by the armorers if the original was FUBARed!
Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 01-12-2018 at 04:16 AM.
-
-
Advisory Panel
Patrick - that was the stated reason.
-
-
Advisory Panel
Got one!
Finally, finally!
Like the Martini-Henry, this has been a wait of some years. But I now have a Model 1884 with the 1879 ramp sight. A beautiful construction, but fiddly to dismantle.
Why dismantle? Because when I tried out my "trap" the shots held a satisfyingly small vertical spread, but wandered from left to right. After ruminating about band tension, warped wood etc, I realised that the slider was too sloppy and could rotate a couple of degrees, so that when cleaning between shots - placing the rifle sights-down on a soft pad, so that the crud fell out of the trap - I was nudging the slider. At least I hope that was the cause - I'll find out next time! So the sight was dismantled, cleaned, tightened up and reassembled.
Examining the rifle to see what else it could be, the answer is nothing, except that the cleaning rod is very, very tight. If I remove the rod, the nose cap is a fraction of a mm clear of the barrel and the front band is not tight. If I insert the rod - which requires some force to make it snap into position, the front band is extremely tight and I reckon the spring is squashed flat. It all feels like a force-fit.
Now before I start filing around, I would like to hear from Trapdoor shooters: Does a Trapdoor group better if the cleaning rod is removed?
-
-
Legacy Member
Patrick - There is a flat-spring with a 'stud' that is fitted and pinned in the Trapdoor forearm tip. The stud locks into the groove that goes around the heavy part of the 'clearing-rod'.
If the flat-spring is broke, I've heard it can effect accuracy, but, this would be rare.
Actually, you are suppose to pull or bow the 'ram-rod/clearing-rod' away from the barrel, before you pull it forward. This helps disengage the 'stud' from the Rod's groove and makes withdrawal and insertion of the Rod easier.
For shooting purposes, the Rod should be left in place.
Attachment 90666
Last edited by butlersrangers; 02-12-2018 at 04:09 PM.
-
Thank You to butlersrangers For This Useful Post: