-
Contributing Member
-
The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to CINDERS For This Useful Post:
-
02-12-2018 03:35 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Contributing Member
Agreed, paper books are so much nicer. Hang in there and keep looking, you'd be surprised at the number of things you can get for the "right price" by simply waiting.
Russ
-
Thank You to RASelkirk For This Useful Post:
-
-
-
-
Legacy Member
And the disturbing thing is that of the billions of books published in the last two centuries, it seems that the oldest will survive the longest.
The reason is manifold, but it relates to materials and processes.
For a VERY long time, paper was made from COTTON, sometimes with a bit of linen thrown in. By the beginning of the 20th Century, the demand for paper was such that a new source of fibre was needed, and wood-pulp was it. The problem was that wood-pulp formed a nasty BROWN shade of paper (lignin), thus the need for "bleaching".
The earliest successful processes centered around variations on "Oxygen Bleaching" and it involved slow processes. The huge rise in demand for paper saw the introduction of a "faster and cheaper" process; "acid-bleaching".
The problem is that the RESIDUAL acid degrades the paper, slowly but inexorably, from the day of manufacture.
Ever wondered why your much-thumbed copy of "Bolt-Action Rifles" or "Cartridges of the World" is looking a little "brown" and the pages feel "dusty"?
Acid-bleached paper.
By contrast, copies of "Twentieth Century Locomotives (1898 Ed.) or the original "Illustrated War News" (1914-1918) look positively pristine, with WHITE, glossy paper that feels smooth and "un-dusty". The bindings may be looking scruffy, but the Century-plus vintage pages are remarkably fresh.
I have dozens of 1950's, '60's and '70's vintage paperback editions of historical texts. like "The Washing of the Spears" (Desmond Morris) and "Inside the Third Reich" (Albert Speer), and a swag of classic Science Fiction titles, and they are starting to look decidedly "tired".
Then there are computer floppy discs, a mere three decades old, which look in pretty good shape, but how many folk will ever be able to read them again?
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Last edited by Bruce_in_Oz; 02-13-2018 at 07:24 PM.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
CINDERS
So in the age of plastic people and computers there is nothing better to me than the feel of paper and the printed word I am pretty happy with that lot.
Well said.
-
-
Legacy Member
And, the other good thing about paper books is that the battery doesn't go flat just when you get to a good bit.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
RASelkirk
Agreed, paper books are so much nicer. Hang in there and keep looking, you'd be surprised at the number of things you can get for the "right price" by simply waiting.
Russ
True, plus I don't want to sound too much like "kids these days" because that opinion is BS and I might be one of those "kids" but for some First World War items the generation that fought the war or whose parents, grandparents or even great grandparents fought the war are leaving us so someone might not know what they have or appreciate it as much since there is less of a connection.
-
Thank You to AD-4NA For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
[quote=CINDERS;423976]I am pretty happy to have it bears some interesting inscriptions[/quote
When I find old books with inscriptions I get sucked in like a Kirby. I got these two books not too long ago.
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to usabaker For This Useful Post: