1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 3 of 3
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #2
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:43 PM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,546
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    06:52 AM
    Hello, & welcome to the forum. You've certainly picked a choice rifle to start your Enfield addiction!

    The scope & bracket you have are clearly mis-matched to your BSA 1945 rifle, as you intimate. The question of whether the scope & bracket have always been together is a little more difficult to be dogmatic about. It is possible that they have always been together, but it is most unusual, in my experience, to find scopes (where dated) mated to later dated rifles. In practice, all genuinely matched Britishicon 4T's that I've seen (as far as I can remember) have been fitted with scopes made in the same year as the rifle, or made after the rifle. However, these are just my anecdotal observations, & there may be others that would dispute this. The scope & bracket could have been mated together as part of an ordnance replacement to a needy 4T, & the centre-punching of the screw slots could have taken place then. I can't be sure from your photo's if the very rough surface of your bracket is due to pitting that has been cleaned off (& the bracket does look rather as though it has been gently tickled at some point), or whether it is just a very rough casting. If the former, the cleaned up pitted surface would not be consistent with the very good exterior finish on the scope, supporting the possibility of them being mated together from different origins.

    The 'D' prefix on the cradle clamps is just a letter prefix as commonly seen on Dalgleish produced brackets. They worked their way through the alphabet & just happened to have got to 'D' when your bracket was made.

    Hope this helps a little.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. The FN C1 with an optic...
    By browningautorifle in forum FNFAL Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-08-2017, 06:29 PM
  2. Recommend me an optic?
    By garrettbragg12 in forum M16A2/AR15A2 Rifles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-04-2014, 12:07 PM
  3. Gew 98 input please.
    By HOOKED ON HISTORY in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 11-29-2013, 10:33 PM
  4. I need your input
    By paulm in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-15-2010, 11:27 PM
  5. fiber optic garand and m14 front sights
    By goo in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-20-2009, 05:26 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts