1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 15
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member rcathey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last On
    04-20-2025 @ 08:06 AM
    Location
    St. Louis, MO Area
    Posts
    1,645
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    05:21 AM
    Thread Starter
    Well that was quick!
    I received a reply (robo-reply?) that stated simply, "A physical sample of the firearm would need to be sent in for evaluation."

    Doesn't necessarily inspire me to run out, build one of these, and then have the ATF deem it "unfit."
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. Thank You to rcathey For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-07-2017, 12:26 PM
  2. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08-01-2015, 09:24 PM
  3. 1898 (1901) Krag
    By c&rfan in forum Krag Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-22-2009, 08:48 PM
  4. Krag 1901 rear sight help
    By Bolivar in forum Gunsmithing for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-02-2009, 03:58 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts