Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: An interesting legal issue to ponder....

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #14
    Legacy Member GeeRam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Last On
    04-26-2025 @ 12:11 PM
    Location
    Berkshire, UK
    Posts
    883
    Local Date
    05-06-2025
    Local Time
    03:03 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by mrclark303 View Post
    My question is this, if D&B convert these to straight pull, wouldn't they still legally speaking, be Sec5 after the changes in classification?

    Or......if converted prior to the ban, would they be exempt from that rule and remain under Sec1?

    My assumption would be that they would still automatically shift to Sec 5 because it's still effectively and legally the same firearm, reciver, barrel etc.

    Unlike the SP L1A1's, Garands etc, that are built from kits with new unported barrels.
    That would also be my understanding of the law as well.

    Once Sect 5, always Sect 5 as the saying goes.

  2. Thank You to GeeRam For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Interesting Issue...
    By amadeus76 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-24-2017, 06:54 PM
  2. Points To Ponder
    By Alan de Enfield in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 05-16-2011, 06:49 AM
  3. California legal Yugo SKS muzzle break issue
    By Aragorn243 in forum Soviet Bloc Rifles
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-25-2010, 05:39 PM
  4. Is This Legal?
    By BruceV in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-02-2009, 11:18 AM
  5. An interesting Navy issue Colt M1911A1.
    By John Holbrook in forum 1911/1911A1 Service Pistol
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-09-2009, 02:24 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts