Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: SKS Dating

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Boris Badinov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Last On
    01-14-2024 @ 11:39 AM
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    47
    Local Date
    05-10-2025
    Local Time
    10:27 PM
    It is semantics. Because there are specific negative implications that apply the to term 'commercial'.

    The only guns known to have been made specifically for the commercial market are the modified variants (ak mags, scopes, short barrel, etc), and the post 1987, standard configuration guns (serial prefixed 88-94). But all of these guns were cobbled together from leftover parts produced for military/security purposes over nearly thirty years of type56 production in China.

    The fact that the op rifle bears a triangular military arsenal stamp as well as the 56type designation are more than enough indication that it is a military rifle (issued or not) that ended up on the commercial market.

    Made by Norinco is a misnomer. As the only guns Norinco might have had a part in "making" are the modified guns and post 1987 standard configuration guns, which, as already stated, were assembled from leftover mil-spec parts.

    I stressed the "not commercial" notion, not to be confrontational or contrary, but because of the negative implications that the term 'commercial' has regarding quality of build, function, and overall reliability.

    Many claim unjustifiably that all of the Chinese sks's are of poor quality and unreliable. But it is not true.

    However, there is a nugget of truth to the claim, because the truly commercial guns -- i.e. the modified ak mag variants-- have a documented history of unreliability in feeding and function and overall magazine fit and compatibility.
    Despite the fact that this reputation only applies to a limited population of the truly "commercial" guns, it has also been mistakenly assumed by many that it applies to the standard configuration guns. Which is patently false.

    Without seeing the op's entire rifle, it may seem difficult to tell what kind of rifle he has -- commercial or mil-spec. But the fact that the rifle still bears the triangle arsenal stamp and the "56type" (五六式) designation indicates that it was manufactured as a mil-spec rifle. As most commercial guns have had the arsenal stamps scrubbed, and the "56type" designation was omitted on every gun assembled after 1984.
    Last edited by Boris Badinov; 11-02-2018 at 08:54 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. dating a BSA.Co SMLE
    By surpman1911 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-21-2015, 12:28 AM
  2. Dating a bolt
    By jamie5070 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-02-2012, 08:12 PM
  3. Help dating a bayonet?
    By Arachnamist in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-28-2010, 07:05 PM
  4. Dating a K11
    By halhunt in forum Swiss Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-16-2010, 06:58 AM
  5. I need help dating and identifying my No.4
    By a303shooter in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-06-2008, 11:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts