1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 20
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 03:33 AM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,719
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    08:59 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Daan Kemp View Post
    Butt might be a replacement.

    Some wise words from the man who knows (PL)
    Wed 2 Jan 2008 9:52 am

    Some of you will by now have noticed that there are TWO shapes inside top surface, inside the No4 rifle butt socket. The OLD ex SMLE shape with a rounded step on the right and a tapered step on the left and the post 1942 (?, but that’s what we called them …..) shape of two rounded steps.
    Officially, and according to our EMER’s, you CAN fit a double rounded stepped butt to a single round/taper step body after adjusting the wood accordingly. But you CANNOT fit a single rounded/taper step butt to a double rounded butt socket. This is because, try as you might, you’ll never truly get it tight ….., or if you do, it won’t last!
    That’s the OFFICIAL party line. But if you think that any old, wise and weary old Armourer Sergeant would allow you to wait until a stock of double rounded butts arrived, from stores in Englandicon to Korea or Aden or Malaya or wherever you were, you’re WRONG. It was quite common practice to simply dovetail, glue, patch, peg and make off the butts to get to the type you need. Simple isn’t it.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  2. Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Identification Help
    By irateacher1 in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-03-2018, 09:18 PM
  2. Identification Question
    By mausernut in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02-06-2016, 09:26 AM
  3. 7.62 No4 Mk1 Identification
    By Enny1 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-13-2015, 06:56 PM
  4. Help with identification!
    By thepalmsUK in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-14-2010, 02:55 PM
  5. Question on Sten identification for Mr. Laidler.
    By gravityfan in forum Other LMG/HMG and SMG Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-15-2009, 04:28 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts