+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: First M1 Rifle sent to Winchester

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member cplstevennorton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-05-2025 @ 09:17 AM
    Location
    Van Wert, OH
    Age
    45
    Posts
    377
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    01:25 PM
    Ok I read a little more. It looks like the 500 educational order was placed in April 1939. Then Ordnance started to look for a company to do a contract of 65,000 by July 1939. WRA and Remington both submitted bids. WRA won, and then was awarded a finalized contract for the 65,000 on 9/20/39.

    There is a little bit a discrepancy as I see some of the first WRA rifles were delivered in Dec 1940, instead of my Jan 1941 above. But it say the 500 Educational order wasn't completed till Jan 1941.

    But regardless, they never geared up to produce anything but the Gas port it looks like.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to cplstevennorton For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Bruce Canfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-08-2019 @ 03:06 PM
    Posts
    26
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    02:25 PM

    WRA

    Winchester never intended to manufacture the M1icon Rifle in anything but gas port configuration. The bulk of the Winchester documentation cited in my book came from the personal files of Edwin Pugsley that I was fortunate to acquire a number of years ago. It is clear that Mr. Pugsley and the WRA engineering staff was not fond of the M1 rifle and was ambivalent about accepting the Educational Order in the first place. The Olins who owned Western Cartridge Company (which had previously acquired Winchester) was very cautious about the Educational Order as well but gave Pugsley the go-ahead to accept the contract. There was a lot of tension and animosity between Springfield Armory and Winchester during the course of production but the "greater good" prevailed as both entities shared a common goal.

  4. #3
    Legacy Member RCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 09:37 AM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,470
    Real Name
    Robert Seccombe
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    01:25 PM
    Thread Starter

    Early Winchester production

    Attachment 102953Here is a photo of a Winchester from my collection, it was purchased from the CMPicon Auction in 2011 as a receiver. The serial number was stamped on Wednesday, Jan 15, 1941. Some collectors think that the Educational Order rifles were serial numbered 100,001 thru 100,500 but it did not happen that way because of spoilage and receivers pulled from production to be reworked.Attachment 102952

  5. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to RCS For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Winchester Model 1890 rifle
    By RCS in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-02-2018, 03:10 PM
  2. Winchester '07 .351 rifle
    By Calfed in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-12-2016, 11:30 PM
  3. 3-44 Winchester M1 rifle (Garand)
    By Bill Hollinger in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-08-2015, 01:04 AM
  4. Help finding parts for a winchester rifle
    By tschie in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-05-2015, 09:37 PM
  5. Winchester Model75 Us Training Rifle
    By M1CHAZZ in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-19-2009, 03:05 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts