I recently came across a 1918 Lee Enfield No.1 MkIII* Canadianmarked, manufactured by Enfield with a 42 Long Branch barrel.
I have a few questions. Pardon my possible ignorance.
Were the No.4 barrels built by LB interchangeable with the original BritishNo.1 SMLE barrels? Can you just take an No.4 LB barrel and install it in a British No.1 SMLE? Do they thread the same to the action body? Or would the barrel have had to be specifically manufactured to fit the No.1?
I don't doubt the fact that LB did refurbs on some No.1's (including replacing the barrels etc) but is it not possible that in this case the barrel could of just been added by anybody at any time through the life of the rifle.
This rifle had a Lithgowmarked nose cap and a Lithgow marked bolt that matched the Enfield receiver? Curiously the sight matched as well though the back sight assembly was BSA marked. Also the serial number on both the bolt and nose cap were prefixed by a "S" ( serial # S83**) matching the Enfield receiver. Is this not an Enfield prefix? According to the info available to me (Skennerton
, Stratton) Lithgow didn't ever use a "S" prefix? Lots of other mixed parts. Whats going on with this one?
Thank you in advance for your time.
Last edited by Canuck13; 02-14-2010 at 06:07 PM.
If you try and fit a No4 barrel in a No1 action the 'cut out' for the extractor will be indexed 180 degrees out - ie the extractor cut out will be on the left hand side.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
We touched on this subject recently so while looking for that thread I found this one which directly addresses the matter, so here are the marks from a Long Branch-made SMLE barrel.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same.