Closed Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 1179

Thread: When it really happens: SHTF...

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member Gil Boyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last On
    02-12-2025 @ 05:16 AM
    Location
    Home of The Parachute Regiment & 16 Air Assault Brigade
    Posts
    4,772
    Real Name
    Gil Boyd
    Local Date
    05-10-2025
    Local Time
    11:15 PM
    Yes I heard a health professional say just that, wearing of masks isn't essential, and yet they are absolutely covered in A&E and ICU units. Bit misleading for the average Joe in the street.
    Surely, it is passed in the main by droplets, so masks should be advised??
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    'Tonight my men and I have been through hell and back again, but the look on your faces when we let you out of the hall - we'd do it all again tomorrow.' Major Chris Keeble's words to Goose Green villagers on 29th May 1982 - 2 PARA

  2. #2
    Legacy Member 22SqnRAE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Last On
    09-27-2023 @ 11:49 PM
    Location
    Brisbane - the middle of right side of Oz
    Posts
    304
    Local Date
    05-11-2025
    Local Time
    09:15 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Gil Boyd View Post
    Yes I heard a health professional say just that, wearing of masks isn't essential, and yet they are absolutely covered in A&E and ICU units. Bit misleading for the average Joe in the street.
    Surely, it is passed in the main by droplets, so masks should be advised??
    Gil, I tend to believe what the docs are saying and am not doubting their logic here. Taking a rather circumspect approach is sensible for them, because of their constant, or repeated exposure to the risk for longer duration than most would in normal environmental settings.

    As for anyone who is 'nipping out for some groceries' then provided they apply the recommended safe distancing, hygiene measures and don't expose themselves in uncontrolled environments with high risk individuals, they are most likely (statistically speaking) to be fine. There's no guarantees, here. Remember, this isn't an instantaneously infectious disease that will manage to pass between people in close proximity. It needs to be persistent contact and then transferred to enter the body's soft interior tissue especially the alimentary canal or eyes.

    When we are finally told about the truth of the infected victims and the terminal cases here in Oz, we actually find that their behaviour, locations, environments and actions have lead to a simple conclusion of: "Well, that was going to end in tears..."

    For those repeatedly or frequently exposed for longer periods to infected people, yes, they need added protection. For people with existing weakening illnesses or conditions, aged or infirm, they too need additional protective measures. But for generally fit and healthy types, that adhere to the warnings, procedures, decontamination processes, I'd wager they have a high chance of getting by just fine.

    I think to be alert and defensive to a reasonable degree makes sense. To be afraid, excessively worried and highly limited in everyday life as a result, doesn't make sense.

    For those of us who endured NBCD (or whatever the acronym is nowadays) training - or worse, became an instructor ( I shudder remembering that...) we were taught to operate under the conditions and not be afraid, but to trust our equipment and procedures. I think some of that recolelciton now might be helpful. I'm not saying there's no risk, that's foolish. I'm suggesting that it's really not all that bad as it may seem, and the statistics are showing this won't end life as we know it.
    Last edited by 22SqnRAE; 04-08-2020 at 05:46 PM. Reason: detail
    Trying to save Service history, one rifle at a time...

  3. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to 22SqnRAE For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    05-08-2025 @ 08:39 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,326
    Local Date
    05-11-2025
    Local Time
    12:15 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by 22SqnRAE View Post
    As for anyone who is 'nipping out for some groceries' then provided they apply the recommended safe distancing, hygiene measures and don't expose themselves in uncontrolled environments with high risk individuals, they are most likely (statistically speaking) to be fine.
    Unfortunately, not everyone sticks to the recommended social distancing guidelines in the 2 local supermarkets that I have visited.

    In one of the shops that I visit it is not possible to keep to the recommended 2m distancing, because the isles are too narrow, less than 2m wide, and it is not possible to pass others in the same isle unless one of those wishing to pass their fellow shopper were to climb on top of the shelves which stretch the length of the isle and are around 2m in height. Of-course if this were to be done the shop would need to provide safety harnesses for customers to use so that one does not find one's self in contravention of safe working heights rules and regulations. Provision of ladders at each end of the shelves may also be helpful otherwise there maybe a tendency for customers to attempt "mountaineering" on the sides of the shelves which may result in some "perishable" goods being "soiled" by customers trying to get a "foothold" in the side of the shelves.
    Last edited by Flying10uk; 04-08-2020 at 07:02 PM.

  6. Thank You to Flying10uk For This Useful Post:


Closed Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts