-
Legacy Member
7,000 No8's to be melted down unless .......................
Have a look at the video 'appeal'.
Save the .22s! Can You Help?
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:
-
04-29-2020 03:18 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Contributing Member
Let’ hope they can be saved... I’d love to buy one, but the UK
does not want me as a buyer...so bad...
34a cp., btg. Susa, 3° rgt. Alpini
-
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
Ovidio
Let’ hope they can be saved... I’d love to buy one, but the
UK
does not want me as a buyer...so bad...
The UK Government doesn't even want me as a buyer and I'm on 'home ground'.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
-
Legacy Member
I think that's it's worth noting that representations have already been made to the UK
government about the No.8's; in fact over a year ago by both LERA and the HBSA.
I'm not sure what response they received if any at all, I will ask those in the know.
-
The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to Strangely Brown For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
You are fighting a bitterly anti-firearm government and a bureaucracy terrified of the embarrassment of facilitating murder. It used to be a pillar of British
common law that you were innocent until proven guilty. Sorry, I'm very sensitive to the prevailing attitude that if you are a gun owner, you are a potential baby killer. I firmly believe in the saying: "You can't trust a government that doesn't trust you."
Some do, some don't; some will, some won't; I might ...
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to NORTHOF60 For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
The excuse given was that there was a EU directive stopping the sale of military weapons to the public. They said that they could to used to train terrorists.
The No.8 is a single shot bolt action .22 rifle. Surely a semi automatic AK47 .22 clone ( which can be purchased easily in the UK
) would be a better training rifle for the purpose. Also. in a few months EU directives will not apply to the UK.
A decent No.8 will fetch £1,000 (that's what I paid for mine 2 years ago) and I believe they would sell readily to the trade for £500 average for all conditions. That is £3,500,000 of our money that could help the NHS.
Not only that but many of us learned to shoot in the cadets with these rifles. THEY ARE PART OF OUR HISTORY.
-
The Following 8 Members Say Thank You to Stanforth For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
I had a couple and shot them to great effect on our small bore team with my battalion in the '70's. Would be sad to see them destroyed, they could glean the Gum't a good few pounds notes. No self respecting terrorist would train on those.
-
-
Legacy Member
It's financial foolishness to not get something for them. Maybe the Brexit deal can be put to some use here. I won't hold my breath.
-
-
Legacy Member
It all comes down to a UN protocol (signed by many / most countries including the UK
& USA
)
This, and other protocols ban the sale of military firearms and ammunition to anyone except another Government department.
Even President Obama, signed up to it - meaning that all us 'home loaders' could now require a Ammunition Manufacturers licence from our Governments.
From the UN document :
(c) “Ammunition” shall mean the complete round or its components,
including cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets or projectiles, that are
used in a firearm, provided that those components are themselves subject to
authorization in the respective State Party;
(d) “Illicit manufacturing” shall mean the manufacturing or assembly of
firearms, their parts and components or ammunition:
(i) From parts and components illicitly trafficked;
(ii) Without a licence or authorization from a competent authority of the
State Party where the manufacture or assembly takes place; or
(iii) Without marking the firearms at the time of manufacture, in accordance
with article 8 of this Protocol;
Licensing or authorization of the manufacture of parts and components shall be in
accordance with domestic law;
Last edited by Alan de Enfield; 04-29-2020 at 03:59 PM.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
-
Contributing Member
While I can accept the wisdom of an international accord to try to control the flow of small arms heading into conflict zones, there has to be 'some' common sense applied!
No8's are in way, shape or form a weapon of war and are obviously purely paper punches.
Their destruction helps no one, but plays extremely well to the anti gun lobby.
Such a shame, like many UK
shooters, the No8 was the first Firearm (and Lee Enfield) I ever fired and I will add one to the collection one day.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to mrclark303 For This Useful Post: