1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 19
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member bombdoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Last On
    06-07-2025 @ 06:31 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    172
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    02:30 PM
    Opinions seem to be shifting regarding the PIAT... it seems to have been the most successful in terms of tank kills of the post DDay light AT weapons. The lack of back blast was a real advantage over the Bazooka and Panzerfaust, particularly at the short ranges it was used. It was particularly suited to close and urban warfare and could be fired from inside buildings.

    The real advantage of the PIAT was that it was easy and quick to make both the projector and the bombs. Shoulder fired rocket systems are notoriously difficult to get right and needed quite sophisticated manufacture and quality control. They are always very temperature sensitive. PIAT bombs were very easy to make using light engineering equipment. It used a modified (rimless) 20 bore shotgun cartridge which was easy to make on existing technology. The PIAT would work in all temperature ranges and was simple and robust to maintain. The original shaped charge warhead was filled with readily available gelignite based plastic explosive in commercial manufacture (PE808). Although not as big as the Panzerfaust warhead, the PIAT warhead was larger and had greater penetration than the 2.36" diameter of the wartime Bazooka.

    Yes, it was a heavy and unpopular bit of kit, but all light anti tank weapons are seldom liked by those who have to carry them. Having had to drag a 84mm Carl Gustav around in my youth ( the big heavy steel one, not the lightweight alloy M3! they have now) I can sympathise, however I suspect you would become immediately popular if an enemy tank turned up!
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to bombdoc For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Took the Boys Anti Tank Rifle to the Range
    By mrclark in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-03-2016, 01:41 AM
  2. boys anti tank rifle
    By camerl2009 in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-22-2012, 05:57 PM
  3. Polish anti-tank rifle
    By jmoore in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-02-2010, 06:24 PM
  4. What is this round? Anti Tank? Year?
    By A. F Medic in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-04-2009, 04:59 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts