Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: 1944 Long Branch No.4 MK1* T

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #26
    Advisory Panel Lee Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    Today @ 04:57 PM
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    1,861
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    02:58 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Surpmil View Post
    Maybe it's time we had a "Notable Fakes" thread? I was reminded of a few while looking through old photos the other day.

    The marks on the barrel reinforce are original IMO as they are under the original finish. Also the burr on the edge of the Nock's Form is in the direction of tightening, not loosening. Unusual to see on a LB rifle, but 1943 was their busiest/most urgent year I believe. But as the rifle is 1944, the 1943 barrel is suspect for that reason alone. However, 60L is very early in 1944 so perhaps just a barrel produced late the year before?

    Amusing that Mr. RFD did not get the numbers right when he sent the bracket off for engraving.

    I have never seen a bolt head face ground in that manner before; anyone else? Might be a "signature"?

    Presumably whoever bought it in 2013 realized it was a fake and kept the Chest No15 and sold on the rifle. Has the chest or photos of it turned up anywhere?

    A 1944 LB would have a fabricated trigger guard AFAIK, and this one looks like UKicon production to boot.

    And Lee Enfield, the relief hole and the area around it look odd for a LB MkI bolt, don't you think? Could be just the photo of course. (And as you pointed out, no chance of that bolt being on a 1944 rifle)

    The "T" stamp warrants close examination. I see an interesting feature I won't specify here (no need to tutor fakers), which I think will be clear to those who have genuine LB rifles.

    Likewise the inside of the rear pad fitting - I won't point out the details, but it should be obvious, are 4BA screws hard to get in some places? Is that steel wool or swarf in the hole!?
    I was looking at the previously posted photos earlier this morning, and I am 100% certain that the rifle is faked.

    There are 2 things that haven't been pointed out (on the open forum anyway) that:
    #1) to my experience with LB snipers absolutely screams fake
    #2) Is easier to see, and (on it's own) makes it very unlikely to be real.

    As you say, no sense in giving the fakers a primer, as they are getting far too good.
    BSN from the Republic of Alberta

    http://www.cartridgecollectors.org/

  2. Thank You to Lee Enfield For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. My first: 1944 Long Branch No4 Mk1*
    By vermintrex in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-24-2013, 03:57 PM
  2. No4 MKI* Long Branch 1944, England '44
    By BigBayouHooter in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-15-2011, 11:54 PM
  3. 1944 Long Branch on the way
    By spinecracker in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 10-13-2009, 01:04 AM
  4. 1944 Long Branch No. 4 Mk 1*
    By c&rfan in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-25-2009, 05:45 PM
  5. .22 Long Branch Cno7 1944
    By Badger in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-12-2007, 08:12 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts