-
Contributing Member
27 Aug 20 Garand Picture of the Day
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose
There are no great men, only great challenges that ordinary men are forced by circumstances to meet.
-
The Following 11 Members Say Thank You to Mark in Rochester For This Useful Post:
25-5,
30-06_mike,
Bill Hollinger,
Bob Womack,
ed skeels,
fjruple,
frankderrico,
Jonzie,
lgr1613,
Ovidio,
RCS
-
08-27-2020 04:35 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
What was useful about the U.S. M37 AT gun, as opposed to the 2Pdr (of 40mm) was it had HE and canister rounds, whereas the 2 Pdr. had nothing but solid shot until 1942. How many thousands must have died for the lack of those HE and canister shells is hard to imagine.
Even worse, the same folly was carried over to their use in almost every British
tank until 1942: no HE or canister!
A triumph of the same blinkered minds that nearly lost the war by failing to provide a decent multi-purpose gun equivalent to the German 88mm Flak36, and then obstructing the use of the 3.7" AA gun in the anti-tank role.
Irony of ironies, the lack of a decent AT gun then meant 25 Pdr.s had to be diverted from their bombardment role into AT use; so much for keeping everything in its "proper role"!
All one can say in favour of the 2 Pdr. is it had a 360° traverse, an automatic breech block and a far better optical sight than the M37. Of course it was also much heavier, higher and harder to dig in. I doubt it could me moved "by hand" either the way a V trail gun could be.
Interesting how the top of the gun shield has been given an irregular profile - was this a local improvisation or a factory job?
Armoured dozer off to the right.
Last edited by Surpmil; 08-29-2020 at 12:27 AM.
Reason: Typos etc.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:
-
-
Advisory Panel
Originally Posted by
Surpmil
What was useful about the U.S. M37 AT gun, as opposed to the 2Pdr (of 40mm) was it had HE and canister rounds, whereas the 2 Pdr. had nothing but solid shot until 1942.
I wondered about that very thing when I saw this, thinking they had only solids and what use would it be. The size of the projectile would hardly make it a super effective shell though...
-
-
Legacy Member
Not knowing anything about the 2Pdr ATk gun and all the other firepower available, the comment about it seems a bit biased? Isn't solid shot what it should have for ATk?
-
PM
