-
Legacy Member
Real or Fake?
Any ideas?
Attachment 118303Attachment 118304Attachment 118305Attachment 118306Attachment 118307
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
Last edited by Badger; 06-30-2021 at 04:24 AM.
-
-
06-30-2021 03:51 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
First one of these I have seen, a very interesting Indian variation. No gas vent/range adjuster so I would assume it would be fitted on an armored vehicle for smoke duties.
-
-
-
Legacy Member
Doesn't look like a pukka military variation.
Grenade launcher brazed onto a No4 bayonet ..........................
The recoil loads would be all wrong as the mounting would not be central onto, and attached to the muzzle, the recoil load would be all offset down onto the bayonet lug.
Notes from Peter Laidler
(31st August 2019)
If my memory serves me correctly, the internally threaded 'nozzle' should be backed up using the stock bolt bit until it is clear. Then the cup should be fitted to the rifle and closed down in the usual way. Then the nozzle, which is machined to form a slight concave to match that of the rifle muzzle, should be tightened/screwed down hard against the muzzle. This way, while the cup discharger is attached to the nose cap and ultimately the fore-end, the actual shock of discharge/recoil is directly down and through the barrel and body into the butt. And NOT the fore-end which will soon split!
Not a lot of people know that The reason that they don't know it is because the nozzle part of the cup discharger is missing OR is jambed (or is it jammed?) solid by the fine thread being absolutely gummed up with carbon. There is no known thread, it is just a thread over a diameter so far as I recall when I made several many years ago. When the cups were returned to Ordnance the instructions stated that the nozzle was to be removed, wrapped in oilcloth and retained inside the cup. But being Ordnance blanket stackers they probably lost thousands of them...........
There....., another totally useless bit of Enfield history knowledge
Last edited by Alan de Enfield; 06-30-2021 at 07:42 AM.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
Lance
First one of these I have seen, a very interesting Indian variation. No gas vent/range adjuster so I would assume it would be fitted on an armored vehicle for smoke duties.
Like these ?
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
I'll bet fantasy piece to make them attractive to the collector community?
-
-
Contributing Member
Jim,
Old ground but wasn't that image on the right the tunnel lads option in WW1???
'Tonight my men and I have been through hell and back again, but the look on your faces when we let you out of the hall - we'd do it all again tomorrow.' Major Chris Keeble's words to Goose Green villagers on 29th May 1982 - 2 PARA
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
Gil Boyd
the tunnel lads option
I remember that bun fight...the "Special" rifle of the tunnel troops.
-
Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
I'll bet fantasy piece to make them attractive to the collector community?
350 GBP
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
Melanie_Daniels
350 GBP
Wow, but we've seen this sort of thing before.
-