+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Thread: N° 8 Mk I trainer fitted with an A. J. Parker 8/53 sight attachment

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Mk VII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 01:38 PM
    Location
    England
    Age
    63
    Posts
    1,438
    Real Name
    James West
    Local Date
    07-03-2025
    Local Time
    10:51 PM
    I think they were all unused actions. The 5's were probably left over from No.5 production, maybe partially finished.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member Didier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Last On
    06-14-2025 @ 01:46 PM
    Location
    France
    Age
    59
    Posts
    27
    Local Date
    07-03-2025
    Local Time
    11:51 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Mk VII View Post
    I think they were all unused actions. The 5's were probably left over from No.5 production, maybe partially finished.
    I must say I had tried to find out about that for quite a long time but the question had apparently never been raised or, at least, had never seemed to attract the attention of Lee-Enfield enthusiasts.

  3. #3
    Legacy Member tr63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last On
    02-05-2022 @ 08:25 AM
    Location
    maine U.S.A.
    Posts
    404
    Real Name
    john senesy
    Local Date
    07-03-2025
    Local Time
    05:51 PM
    I under stand the number 8 used the PH D receiver sight that used a much higher drilled and taped hole on the left side of the receiver to attach it .

  4. #4
    Legacy Member Didier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Last On
    06-14-2025 @ 01:46 PM
    Location
    France
    Age
    59
    Posts
    27
    Local Date
    07-03-2025
    Local Time
    11:51 PM
    Thread Starter
    I wanted to thank everybody on here for their messages - I now have a clearer idea of how these rifles were made and where their constitutive elements came from.
    I would be curious to know how many No.8 MkI trainers underwent FTR at Enfield in the late 60s - Ian Skennertonicon states that "Quite a few of the No. 8 rifles also bear Enfield receiver markings 'UE' followed by the year and the FTR mark." (The Lee-Enfield, A Century of Lee-Metford & Lee-Enfield Rifles & Carbines (page 508) but that does not tell us how many were actually FTR'ed at that time.

    This one is actually my second Lee-Enfield trainer, the first one being an ex-1916 BSA Mk III* SMLE converted to a No.2 Mk IV* rifle. I am also into WW2 Britishicon uniform collecting, which is rather consistent with the taste I am developing for Lee-Enfield rifles, I think



  5. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Didier For This Useful Post:


  6. #5
    Legacy Member Didier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Last On
    06-14-2025 @ 01:46 PM
    Location
    France
    Age
    59
    Posts
    27
    Local Date
    07-03-2025
    Local Time
    11:51 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by tr63 View Post
    I under stand the number 8 used the PH D receiver sight that used a much higher drilled and taped hole on the left side of the receiver to attach it .
    I had not really noticed the screw on the left side, next to the safety lever, or, at least, had thought it served some practical purpose on the rifle as it is, but upon closer scrutiny I was able to see that it is not present on all No. 8 rifles - do you think it would be possible to ascertain which of the numerous PH sights had once been attached to this rifle?


  7. #6
    Legacy Member tr63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last On
    02-05-2022 @ 08:25 AM
    Location
    maine U.S.A.
    Posts
    404
    Real Name
    john senesy
    Local Date
    07-03-2025
    Local Time
    05:51 PM
    PH No 5D was used for the No8 it did not use the threaded hole as used for the ejector on the No4 .It had a higher mounting arm than the PH 5 and used threaded holes on the left side of the receiver. One that was much higher then found on the .303 cal. No4 and the hole just in front of the safety . that is not found on the No4 .
    Last edited by tr63; 09-08-2021 at 11:10 AM.

  8. #7
    Legacy Member Didier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Last On
    06-14-2025 @ 01:46 PM
    Location
    France
    Age
    59
    Posts
    27
    Local Date
    07-03-2025
    Local Time
    11:51 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by tr63 View Post
    PH No 5D was used for the No8 it did not use the threaded hole as used for the ejector on the No4 .It had a higher mounting arm than the PH 5 and used threaded holes on the left side of the receiver. One that was much higher then found on the .303 cal. No4 and the hole just in front of the safety . that is not found on the No4 .
    Thank you.
    So, if I got it right, the receiver of my No. 8 is already threaded to accommodate such a PH No 5D sight?

    Here are some better pictures:

    Last edited by Didier; 09-08-2021 at 02:36 PM. Reason: Photos added

  9. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Didier For This Useful Post:


  10. #8

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-11-2018, 10:33 AM
  2. SLR -Fitted with double aperture rear sight
    By Flying10uk in forum FNFAL Rifles
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-05-2016, 07:16 PM
  3. NZ No. 2 Patt 14 AJ Parker .22 Trainer
    By Roy in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-01-2014, 09:00 PM
  4. Springfield M1903 - previously fitted with a Lyman M48 Receiver sight?
    By Arkaler in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-12-2013, 10:43 PM
  5. M 1903 rear sight attachment
    By kanterj in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-07-2013, 08:12 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts