1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 34
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 08:11 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,308
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    01:18 PM
    It's surprising that the AR10 rifle wasn't used more widely, by more armed forces, when one considers that the FAL series of rifles was once commonly in use.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 07:51 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,008
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    05:18 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Flying10uk View Post
    It's surprising that the AR10 rifle wasn't used more widely,
    You can see how it was dropped from considerations when the original sales pitch came and the two rifles, one .223 and one 7.62 travelled the world. After a while they gave the 7.62 ammo away as no one wanted to shoot it. Just the little one.

    It's all in the book. Too, the FN and AR10 aren't even close to the same.
    Regards, Jim

  3. Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 08:11 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,308
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    01:18 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifleicon View Post
    Too, the FN and AR10 aren't even close to the same.
    I wasn't, in any way, suggesting that they are. The point that I was implying is that they both fire 7.62 Nato. Or to put it another way 7.62 Nato was a popular caliber for military rifles at the time.

  6. #4
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 07:51 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,008
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    05:18 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Flying10uk View Post
    they both fire 7.62 Nato
    Yes, they do that. But we can't just roll them together in caliber, military rifles aren't like that. The handling is important, the feel. That platform proved the light caliber was widely accepted and the heavy caliber not much.
    Regards, Jim

  7. Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Contributing Member mrclark303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last On
    04-25-2025 @ 07:26 PM
    Location
    The wild west of England
    Posts
    3,441
    Real Name
    Mr Clark
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    01:18 PM
    It's an interesting one Jim, I would say the AR10 was a failing of the advertising men, a wrong time to the market really, Fn had pretty much cornered the 7.62mm market with the Fal in the late 1950's.

    By the 1960's, Vietnam ensured the AR15 a launch pad and a market dominance it still effectively has 50 years later.
    .303, helping Englishmen express their feelings since 1889

  9. #6
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 07:51 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,008
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    05:18 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by mrclark303 View Post
    a wrong time to the market
    Perhaps...
    Regards, Jim

  10. #7
    Legacy Member RCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 08:07 AM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,466
    Real Name
    Robert Seccombe
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    07:18 AM
    The AR-10 was manufactured under license by a Dutch Company in 1960 and adopted by Portugal. These were issued to paratroops and special forces and used
    from 1961 to 1974 in Angola, Portuguese Guinea and Mozambigue extensively. Some were fitted with 3x scopes, all were selective fire and could use rifle grenades.
    None of these AR-10's exhibited the problems and issues associated with the early M16's service in Viet Nam under identical conditions.

    Note: after Portugal retired their AR-10 rifles, the parts kits (without the selective fire lower) were imported into the USAicon where some companies manufactured a
    semi auto steel lower to fit these kits, they are still around !

  11. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to RCS For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. 13-170 M14 Picture of the Day - Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
    By Mark in Rochester in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Picture of the Day Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-20-2013, 09:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts