-
Advisory Panel
Your rifle's handguard has a convex profile between the rear sight and lower band. You need a handguard with a straight profile. And here's a picture of an acceptable cocking piece.
https://imgur.com/a/vt8XQjI.jpg
J.B.
-
Thank You to John Beard For This Useful Post:
-
07-10-2023 09:43 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Goopy, I personally wouldn't worry about that handguard. You see some in Marine pics.
-
-
-
Advisory Panel
What's the date and location on that picture? That looks like a post-WWII ROTC or parade rifle picture.
J.B.
-
-
Legacy Member
-
-
Legacy Member
I have more pics of that style handguard in my files, but I really didn't taken much time to look.
But for instance I see a couple in this group photo taken in Boot Camp in 1942. You always see a mix of various styles in photos.
So Goopy, I would not worry about that handguard at all personally.
-
-
Legacy Member
2nd Marine on the left and clearly dated August 1940.

Last edited by cplstevennorton; 07-12-2023 at 10:49 AM.
-
Thank You to cplstevennorton For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Goopy For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
All the handguards in your pictures correctly are straight-profile handguards. And I believe the handguard in the first picture may also be a straight-profile handguard, given that the picture was taken at an obtuse angle. The contract for the convex-profile handguards was not placed until late 1944 at the earliest. And the USMC used very few, if any, of those handguards. It was an Army Ordnance contract.
J.B.
-
-
Legacy Member
Thanks Goopy!
I have found a lot of really neat things, such as these handguards, by searching the boot camp photos. I have seen quite a few of those handguards in the Marine pictures.
It's a really nice rifle. I hope you enjoy it.
-