I thought I would put in my 2 cents. The doctor charging $79 a month plus $10 co pay per visit seems to me as being no different than having an attorney on retainer. If he can make a go of it and provide the care he wishes to provide I say good for him. It is his practice and should be allowed to run it as he sees fit regarding payment for his service. The attornies have their set fees and percentages and we the client are stuck with it unless we shop for another attorney. These folks shop for a doctor that would work with them. What is the difference? I see none. The state always seems to get their nose into things when it is different than the usual and when it works. Another small business will bite the dust for being different.Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.