-
Contributing Member
1 Nov 2023 Garand Picture of the Day
Information
 |
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose
There are no great men, only great challenges that ordinary men are forced by circumstances to meet.
-
The Following 15 Members Say Thank You to Mark in Rochester For This Useful Post:
25-5,
42rocker,
Bill Hollinger,
Bob Womack,
CINDERS,
ed skeels,
fboyj,
Flying10uk,
frankderrico,
Jonzie,
lgr1613,
Ovidio,
RAM1ALASKA,
RCS,
Zeke55
-
10-29-2023 09:44 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Senior Moderator
(Milsurp Forums)
Bill Hollinger
"We're surrounded, that simplifies our problem!"
-
-
-
Contributing Member
Originally Posted by
Bill Hollinger
91/30.
I'd rather say M44. Foldable bayo to be seen.
34a cp., btg. Susa, 3° rgt. Alpini
-
-
Senior Moderator
(Milsurp Forums)
Originally Posted by
Ovidio
I'd rather say M44. Foldable bayo to be seen.
You are 100% right. I saw the shadow and goofed. 
Bill Hollinger
"We're surrounded, that simplifies our problem!"
-
-
Contributing Member
A newbie here and I’m sensing i have an opportunity to learn something today. Some hints please - M44 and 91/30 refer to…….?
-
-
Contributing Member
Soviet
Mosin Nagant carbine and rifle respectively.
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Low & Slow For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
There is also the M38 in between. It is like the M44 (short), but without the folding bayo. It actually has no bayo fixing at all, since it was considered a thing of the past. A decision which was reverted immediately after the war started and the missing bayo was making itself felt in the real world.
34a cp., btg. Susa, 3° rgt. Alpini
-
The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to Ovidio For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
Yes. The M38 was intended for support troops who didn't need to be encumbered by a full length rifle, but unlikely to run into real trouble. M-44 was meant to replace the 91-30 for combat duty, hence the bayonet. Soldiers with 91-30's were not issued a scabbard for the bayonet. It was supposed to be left on, and fired, mounted.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Low & Slow For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
The Soviets also developed a 91/30 with a kind of foldable bayo. I don't remember exactly how it was made, but it resembles the one of the M44, is not the same though.
But I may be wrong here.
There is one such rifle on sale here in Italy, I have to look it up (if it is still there).
I found that interesting at the time. Then I forgot about it...
I hope it has been sold, otherwise I'll have another itch to scratch. Damn...
34a cp., btg. Susa, 3° rgt. Alpini
-
Thank You to Ovidio For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
-
Thank You to Ovidio For This Useful Post:
PM
