-
Contributing Member
As I'm still figuring out the use of iron sights, the acquisition of a scope is deferred. For now at least, I replaced the MkII sight with a Parker Hale:
[IMG]
[/IMG]
All that is left of the scope mount is the front bracket and I'll just leave that as it is.
-
-
04-17-2024 06:53 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
You'll find the Parker Hale sights are great to use.
-
Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:
-
-
Advisory Panel
Make sure you keep the knob on the elevation quick release tightened down.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
-
Contributing Member
You might be interested to learn that this rifle originates from the Bob Faris collection. Ian has had it listed in the Faris collection with tag number 198. His notes say "not considered to be ex-service", his description says "Factory Savage No.4 with German
style tip-off mounts". As others have already indicated these are also very common for Mannlicher-Schönauer rifles.
-
-
Contributing Member

Originally Posted by
Promo
You might be interested to learn that this rifle originates from the Bob Faris collection. Ian has had it listed in the Faris collection with tag number 198. His notes say "not considered to be ex-service", his description says "Factory Savage No.4 with
German
style tip-off mounts". As others have already indicated these are also very common for Mannlicher-Schönauer rifles.
That is interesting. I purchased this rifle at the Central Wisconsin Collector's Gun Show. I was looking for a No 4, Mk 1* and this was the only one there.
By the way, proper screws for the Parker Hale arrived today:



The original scope bracket may be easily put back if I ever decide to find the required parts and rings. I have downloaded the PH5C manual from this site though the resolution isn't all that great.
Last edited by Neuraleanus; 04-26-2024 at 07:51 AM.
-
-
Legacy Member
Rather than going for the 'short bolt' mounting (at the rear of the PH5C that goes thru the original rear sight mounting holes) you have gone for the full length bolt.
This can cause problems, unless you have put a lock nut 'inside' the original mounting.
It is VERY easy to overtighten that rear bolt and with very little effort you can get it tight enough to distort the rifle body and trap / pinch the bolt. (Don't ask me how I know !)
So I changed it over to the short-bolt.
I found that going for the 'short bolt' option had no effect on the rifle, no apparent 'spreading under load' of the body, and allowed me to clamp the sight up nice and tight so there was no movement.
Last edited by Alan de Enfield; 04-25-2024 at 03:26 AM.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member

Originally Posted by
Alan de Enfield
Rather than going for the 'short bolt' mounting (at the rear of the PH5C that goes thru the original rear sight mounting holes) you have gone for the full length bolt.
This can cause problems, unless you have put a lock nut 'inside' the original mounting.
It is VERY easy to overtighten that rear bolt and with very little effort you can get it tight enough to distort the rifle body and trap / pinch the bolt. (Don't ask me how I know !)
So I changed it over to the short-bolt.
I found that going for the 'short bolt' option had no effect on the rifle, no apparent 'spreading under load' of the body, and allowed me to clamp the sight up nice and tight so there was no movement.
Alan, is there an acknowledged inch/lb. setting for a torque screw driver to prevent the clamping effect but also prevent loosening of the long screw? I am about to mount a picatinny rail on my Long Branch that uses a long screw to help secure the mount.
-
-
Contributing Member

Originally Posted by
Alan de Enfield
I found that going for the 'short bolt' option had no effect on the rifle, no apparent 'spreading under load' of the body, and allowed me to clamp the sight up nice and tight so there was no movement.
The bolt seems to be working fine with the long bolt, but I'll keep this idea in mind. I have more screws that I could cut.
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
Sapper740
Alan, is there an acknowledged inch/lb. setting for a torque screw driver to prevent the clamping effect but also prevent loosening of the long screw? I am about to mount a picatinny rail on my Long Branch that uses a long screw to help secure the mount.
None that I ever found, it was just a case of trial and error - tighten a bit, does the bolt run freely, tighten a bit, does the bolt run freely ............................. tighten a bit, bolt is binding so back off a fraction, does the blt now run freely ?
If you put the long bolt thru the RH side hole, then put another nut on it, push the bolt thru the left hand hole, and tighten the nut up until it touches the inside edge of the LH side hole. Back it out, fit the sight, thread and tighten the bolt up until it is tight and the LH side of the body is trapped betwen the 'lock nut' and the sight bracket.
No compression on the body and the sight is tightly clamped.
Easier to do than to describe.
Then I just decided to use he 'short bolt' method.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
Alan de Enfield
Then I just decided to use he 'short bolt' method.
Exactly.
-