+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Volley and back sights on MLE and CLLE: why the difference?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Contributing Member Sapper740's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2022
    Last On
    Today @ 03:45 PM
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    996
    Local Date
    05-12-2025
    Local Time
    06:25 PM

    Volley and back sights on MLE and CLLE: why the difference?

    I have an MLE and CLLE in my collection, both private purchase target rifles built by BSA at some unknown date. They both have the dial sight plate still attached, 1600 to 2800 yards. The dial sight plate on the MLE is stamped with the Roman numeral II, the CLLE's plate is stamped LES2. I was researching if the changeover from the Mark VI to the Mark VII round was denoted by other means when I chanced upon a little tidbit of information from Mr. Skennertonicon's book: the dial plates for CLLEs are graduated from 1700 to 2700 yards, not 1600 to 2800 as with the MLE. Further, the back sights also have different graduations between the two rifles: sight leaf marked to 1800 yards on the MLE, marked to 1900 on the CLLE. Was there a cogent reason for rifles with the same length barrels firing the same ammunition manufactured by the same manufacturer having differently graduated sights? Or is this simply another Lee Enfieldism?
    Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	A CLLE sight 2.jpg‎
Views:	116
Size:	1.84 MB
ID:	137135   Click image for larger version

Name:	A CLLE sight 1.jpg‎
Views:	113
Size:	2.09 MB
ID:	137136   Click image for larger version

Name:	A CLLE sight MLE.jpg‎
Views:	105
Size:	2.11 MB
ID:	137137  

  2. Thank You to Sapper740 For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #2
    Contributing Member smle addict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 06:38 PM
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    493
    Real Name
    A. G.
    Local Date
    05-12-2025
    Local Time
    04:25 PM
    Nice collection of rifles, especially the Mk III Ross! Regarding your question as to the sighting, the answer is fairly simple; MLE's were sighted for Mk 6 ammunition, while CLLE's were sighted for Mk 7 ammunition. BUT.... Some CLLE's, were graduated for both Mk 6 and Mk 7 ammunition. If you read Skennertonicon's description of the CLLE MK I*, he states after the introduction of the Mk 7 ammo, some rifles were adjusted for the new load. One should infer that some, but not all CLLE's were re-calibrated for Mk 7 ammunition.

    The Mk 6 load was an older load (215 grain bullet, approx 2000 fps). The new Mk 7 load fired a 174 gr bullet, reaching approx 2470 FPS. Enough of a difference in ballistics to necessitate a sight change.

    Case in point: I have two CLLE MK I*'s; both converted by VSM in 1909. One is calibrated for Mk 6 loads (like the MLE), while the other is re-calibrated for Mk 7 loads. Those rifles that were not upgraded still have rear sight beds graduated to 500 yards. Volley sight plates remain marked with "II," and are still graduated to 2800 yards.
    Upgraded rifles have the rear sight bed marked to 600, the volley plate graduated to 2700 yards, and those plates are marked with a "CL." (see attached photos)
    Rear sight ladders were also re-graduated. CLLE's sighted for Mk 6 have there rear sight ladders graduated to 1800 yards, whereas the CLLE's sighted for Mk 7 are graduated to 1900 yards.

    The LES 2 plate was fitted to the SMLE series of rifles (short rilfes) utilizing Mk 7 loads.
    It would appear your rifle has had its original volley sight placed with one from an SMLE. Perhaps it was missing it's original, and someone plugged in a shaved LES 2 plate. When the volley arm was ground off, the surrounding wood usually bears some evidence of this as well. This is not uncommon, as I have seen many rifles with a variety of plates installed on the wrong rifles.
    The Long-Lee volley plate with the "II" mark turn up on the various auction sights with some frequency.
    Hope this helps!
    Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0263.jpg‎
Views:	102
Size:	637.7 KB
ID:	137138   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0264.jpg‎
Views:	103
Size:	812.6 KB
ID:	137139   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0266 (2).jpg‎
Views:	63
Size:	710.6 KB
ID:	137140   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0267.jpg‎
Views:	66
Size:	715.6 KB
ID:	137141   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0269 (1).jpg‎
Views:	67
Size:	945.8 KB
ID:	137142  
    Last edited by smle addict; 09-02-2024 at 01:41 PM.

  5. The Following 7 Members Say Thank You to smle addict For This Useful Post:


  6. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Le1 Volley Sights VS SMLE Volley Sights
    By TheAlpineWolf in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-06-2021, 03:22 PM
  2. Value Of P14 With Volley Sights?
    By P51Mustang in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-28-2020, 09:23 PM
  3. Anyone one ever actually tried their Volley Sights?
    By AD-4NA in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-23-2015, 01:13 PM
  4. No. 1 Mk III volley sights
    By nhetzer in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-26-2010, 02:28 PM
  5. Volley sights?
    By nhetzer in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-10-2009, 06:54 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts