-
Legacy Member
Remember the huge combined workshops
Peter Laidler
described to us? He said that all overseas rifles went into these and then rifles would be reissued on a basis of one to one, regardless of where they started. That was how mixed manufacturers came to be in various possessions.
Wasn't that a 2008 post on Jouster
, where PL was talking about the Crown Agents contracts and was specifically talking about the No5 ?
I think I mentioned earlier that when we were doing the big Crown Agents FTR programme, it was priced (so I was told) that if 70 came in, 70 went out and if some were ZF’d (scrap) then they’d be replaced from our ANZUK (I think this was Aust, NZ
and UK
stockholdings) mobilization stores from the huge …., and I mean HUGE Ordnance stockpiles close by at Johore Bahru. So we would cannibalise No5’s and if necessary, send them out with No4 bodies.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:
-
01-08-2025 04:20 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
Alan de Enfield
Wasn't that a 2008 post on
Jouster
, where PL was talking about the Crown Agents contracts and was specifically talking about the No5 ?
It had to be here, I was never on Jouster. We were talking about the #4 rifles at that point and FNs... Anyway, he'll be along to summarize I hope.
-
-
-
Legacy Member
I think it's just the usual 'B' that's double-stamped.
-
Thank You to Mk VII For This Useful Post:
-
Yes, the letter punch probably 'bounced'.
-
Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post: