-
Legacy Member
-
The Following 9 Members Say Thank You to 303 Gunner For This Useful Post:
-
02-17-2025 04:56 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
Definitely could have been a disaster in such a rare revolver.
-
Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:
-
-
Contributing Member
Thanks for the heads up. I don't have a lot of that, but I'll be sure to check it.
-
Thank You to Low & Slow For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
My dream gun.
-
-
Legacy Member
Glad you are you.
Later 42rocker
-
-
Legacy Member
Did some further *careful* experimentation with the W-F and a Mk VI. In about 24 rounds fired in the Fosbery, 3 bullets came unseated in the cylinder and dumped powder. I then switched to the Mk VI and shot my remaining ammo (about 120 rounds) and had no issues.
My theory is that Fiocchi minimally crimps their rounds and that crimp is overcome by the recoil and movement inherent to the Webley-Fosbery design. The rounds performed fine in the more traditional Mk VI. This is further backed up by the few thousand Fiocchi .455 rounds I've put through my other Webleys without incident. I would evaluate that Fiocchi ammo is fine in traditional revolvers, but unsatisfactory for Webley-Fosberys.
-
-
Advisory Panel
Yes...recoil can pull bullets. I had a man that wanted the harshest .44 mag ammo I could assemble. It was all about recoil. He told me some would back out and he could only load four in a cylinder. That made sence even with a heavy crimp. WF may have something special about the way it recoils when doing it's cycle that a regular revolver doesn't. Never fired one...yet.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post: