-
Legacy Member
Sporter Ross Mk2...
Auction win for these 2 rifles paid $350 inc shipping. Ross has a monte carlo stock and the load assistance device has been removed to make it a hunting rifle.
The debate has begun about restoring it....which is an expensive problem for the stock but what other parts may be missing internally related to the load assist device?
-
-
03-21-2025 10:32 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
Probably only the thumbpiece has been cut off. Shouldn't be difficult to find a replacement.
You are going to need a complete stock set with all the related fittings, from buttplate to nosecap. That is going to be something of a challenge.
-
-
-
Legacy Member
My son took it apart and says pieces are missing. We will get picks when we can.
-
-
Advisory Panel
It looks to me like the barrel has been set back. We were just talking about one of those barrels too, short knoxform. Current production stocks are available...but the small parts can be hard to get.
-
-
Legacy Member
Forgive me on this but I'm not following....
-
-
Advisory Panel
Thousands of Mk. II*** rifles were supplied to the US in 1917. Some had their barrels set back. The shank in front of the receiver ring is shorter than if the barrel had not been altered.
The thumbpiece is riveted to the magazine follower. Not unusual for it to be removed when a rifle was sporterized. Replacing the magazine follower w/thumbpiece is easy enough to do.
When made, the rifle had a magazine cutoff in the front of the trigger guard and a spring. Can't see it in your photos.
-
-
Legacy Member
My son had the rifle apart and I'm confident someone smithed this gun to fit the stock. The magazine box is sheet steel formed then spot welded to the bottom plate.
I can't get pics to load from my phone but I will get them posted on Monday. That will give me a chance to compare what I have to a diagram.
-
-
Advisory Panel
Originally Posted by
mnmkeller
I'm not following....
It looks to me like the barrel has been set back.
Originally Posted by
tiriaq
The shank in front of the receiver ring is shorter
At left the picture of yours, center a drawing of original. At right another that has been turned back to recut the chamber.
Note how wide the area that should be in front of the barrel ring, .850"...Yours might measure .250". Yours has had the barrel set back and recut an enlarged chamber. And...the pipe wrench mark on the barrel.
-
-
Legacy Member
So what is the net effect or goal of this process?
-
-
Advisory Panel
Originally Posted by
mnmkeller
net effect or goal of this process?
Chambers were to say the least generous. That was to allow low tolerance ammo to fit and allow some crud to go in besides and still function. When they recut the chamber it would be tighter. The point is, EVERYTHING was done to this rifle. You can't restore it in a standard stock because the barrel is now shorter. It's a shooter, if it's safe.
-
PM
