You didn't read the article I posted. India did not stamp bayonets "India", they stamped them with a minimum of the arsenal mark, RFI, MWR, JU, MIL and the RFI ones being the primary arsenal also had a crown and GRI on them.

WWII examples of the Kukri's in the article are marked with these arsenals, not "India". They did issue them, no ones disputing that, but "India" marked is very likely post independence. The broad arrow could have been added at any time, as I said, it doesn't look right to me.

I can't say that it isn't WWII, I'm saying I personally do not believe it is WWII for the reasons stated. You did ask for opinions, that's what I offered.

I can't say that mine is military issue, not officially to the UK for sure as it has no broad arrow. It is Nepalese, came from the Nepalese arsenal and appears to be an MKII which would be mid war on to the postwar period.

The Britishicon made their own also, these have British arsenal marks.