1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Capt Quahog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-30-2012 @ 07:40 AM
    Posts
    114
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    03:47 AM

    ~ Perhaps there needs to be an addendum to the police field manual

    Perhaps there needs to be an addendum to the police field manual. This situation just on it's face looks to be a formula for disaster. Let's see . . . a domestic dispute with a violent husband and wife beef. The husband can be figured to be in a confrontational mindset and is at a gun range, probably with a weapon in lock n' mode. Talk about a dangerous scenario!

    Cops go into the place and just Taser the guy? There must be a part or two of this story that's been left out. Logic would suggest that even a know nothing civilian like myself would size up the situation. Then try to first talk with the guy to find out where his head is at. It would be assumed, especially by trained police personnel, that this jerk is armed without a gun being in sight. Using overt non-lethal force against a possible lethally armed individual is very stupid. Something big is missing in this story.

    Anyway it's sliced . . . the whole thing is a very bad and sad situation. If this saga is true, then a good n' slippery lawyer could possibly work the initial Taser attack into the killer's court defense. So stunned by the electrical shock was he, that instinct took over. The harsh electrical pulse of the non-lethal weapon short circuited the defendant's brain and the police officers were seen to be just two blurry attackers. It was a form of instinctive self defense carried-out by his active sub-conscious during temporary amnesia having been directly caused by the cop's Taser. Then they have a couple of paid whowa psychiatrists testify for the defense to back up this pile of bullcrap.

    All there has to be is reasonable doubt in the jury's thinking. The way it is, if some hotshot DA goes for a Murder-One thing and over-charges this guy, a jury could let him walk. As weird and perverse as things are these days, the law enforcement officers might even be blamed for causing their own deaths.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Capt Quahog; 06-09-2009 at 09:49 AM.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Just heard news flash 3 LEO Killed
    By JohnMOhio in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-06-2009, 07:47 AM
  2. South Florida Sun-Sentinel Assault Weapons Poll.
    By NightMaher in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 03-18-2009, 05:04 PM
  3. Would you prefer to be killed by a person or by a drone?
    By Louis of PA in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-16-2009, 08:09 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts