Results 1 to 10 of 46

Thread: Enfield headspace issue?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #18
    Legacy Member ireload2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    not Canada
    Posts
    450
    Local Date
    05-12-2025
    Local Time
    10:27 AM
    The design of the Lee-Enfield chamber and ammunition is problematic.
    When the chamber is at it's largest (minimum material condition) and the brass is at it's smallest (minimum material condition) the clearance between the case and the chamber is about .012 at the case head. In actual use the difference is about .010. This is about 2X what is found with other infantry cartridges.
    In addition the Lee-Enfield standardized chamber has a shoulder that looks nothing like the ammo and the chamber shoulder can be as much as .067 forward of the shoulder of the ammunition. This promotes stretching of the brass also.
    While there are variations of head space they are minor in comparison to the engineered in clearances between ammo and chambers. These clearances combine with the springiness of the rear locking Lee-Enfield design, which dates back to the black powder era, to promote stretching of the case head at the junction of the solid head and the case walls. Insuring there is minimal stretching of the case head on the first firing will improve case life regardless of the actual measured headspace of the rifle.
    Last edited by ireload2; 10-27-2009 at 03:07 PM. Reason: rampant typos

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts