1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    STU1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-08-2012 @ 07:05 AM
    Posts
    113
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    12:54 PM
    here is 20961XX with it's stamped BE-B trigger housing and all of it's correct parts except for the rear sight the rifle is a bit later than yours but not by much. WB has wrong info, the trigger housing was requested by SP earlier than Jan 44 and obviously used them well before Jan 44

    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    dnikkor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-05-2014 @ 02:49 AM
    Posts
    174
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by STU1 View Post
    here is 20961XX with it's stamped BE-B trigger housing and all of it's correct parts except for the rear sight the rifle is a bit later than yours but not by much. WB has wrong info, the trigger housing was requested by SP earlier than Jan 44 and obviously used them well before Jan 44
    The carbine I'm looking at has a ST marked braised trigger housing. I hope you are right. Is that is a type 2 front band on yours? Thanks again and thanks for showing your very nice SP.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Legacy Member Bruce McAskill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-17-2023 @ 09:10 PM
    Posts
    1,880
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    Stu when was your carbine made? I ask as Standard Products didn't get the BE-B trigger housings till after 01-25-44 when requested from IBM. Riesch lists the ST marked housings as being used first.

  5. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    dnikkor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-05-2014 @ 02:49 AM
    Posts
    174
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce McAskill View Post
    Stu when was your carbine made? I ask as Standard Products didn't get the BE-B trigger housings till after 01-25-44 when requested from IBM. Riesch lists the ST marked housings as being used first.
    Hi Bruce, I don't have Riesch's book yet (should be under the xmas tree). When did he say SP started using ST trigger housings? War Baby says they started 1/15/44.

    The Standard Products I already have has a BE-B housing. Its serial #209199x was supposedly made in Sept. '43 according to some of the knowledgeable folks here. (Scott & Duff points more to Oct or Nov. '43, which would be nice since it has an Underwood barrel dated 11/43)

    Standard Products seem to gravitate towards me. My first carbine was a SP with serial #212099x I bought on Gunbroker and the same sources said it was from late Dec. '43 though Ruth & Duff suggests real early Jan. '44. Shortly after getting this one, I took it to a local gunsmith to be checked out. Another man was there to pick up his SP he inherited from his father-in-law. His was vastly nicer than mine and lived in a great Winchester stock. It most likely was a DCM gun. Mine was pretty worn inside & out and in a M2 stock (a nice one though). Long story short, I paid more than I wanted to, but I bought his and then sold mine. Now an even nicer one may drop in my lap in WWII configuration (barring rebuild mark & some newer non-SP parts).

    Do you (or anybody else) have a good guesstimate on manufacturing dates for #209502x & #209199x? Thanks.

  6. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    STU1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-08-2012 @ 07:05 AM
    Posts
    113
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    12:54 PM
    Bruce, i'll have to dig out the data sheet on that particular rifle but if memory serves me correct it was a BE-B but i could have it confused with the Bavarian SP as well; Oct 44 for the manufacture timeframe. dnikkor thanks, it has a type 1 band.

  7. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    STU1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-08-2012 @ 07:05 AM
    Posts
    113
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    12:54 PM
    just checked my picture files and found a closer shot of the TH, it is marked ST the rifle has a Marlin barrel (undated) had it confused with the Bavarian 21588XX that has a 1-44 Underwood barrel and BE-B TH, also had SP 21287XX my first carbine also with a 12-43 dated I.B.M. barrel, 217XXXX with a Underwood 2-44 barrel BE-B TH and a factory chisel staked squared S flip rear sight. the best i can gather is that 20961XX was made in Sept/Oct of 43 the chart in the Duff/Ruth book is/was a work in progress.
    Last edited by STU1; 12-04-2009 at 09:30 PM.

  8. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    dnikkor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-05-2014 @ 02:49 AM
    Posts
    174
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    Thread Starter
    Well, I learned a valuable lesson....He who snoozes, looses.
    Yes, bought out from under me. At least I have the satisfaction of knowing that the SOB who beat me paid nearly $200 more than I could have bought it for. Valuable lesson, but a painful one too. Hope it got a nice home.

  9. #8
    Legacy Member Bruce McAskill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-17-2023 @ 09:10 PM
    Posts
    1,880
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    dnikkor, The two carbines in the 2.09 range would have a date of about November 1943.

  10. Thank You to Bruce McAskill For This Useful Post:


  11. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    dnikkor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-05-2014 @ 02:49 AM
    Posts
    174
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce McAskill View Post
    dnikkor, The two carbines in the 2.09 range would have a date of about November 1943.
    You brightened my day. If correct, that means my SP serial #212099x could actually have the original barrel, an Underwood dated 11/43. Thanks, I needed that.

  12. #10
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    dnikkor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-05-2014 @ 02:49 AM
    Posts
    174
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    Thread Starter
    I don't know why Standard Products carbines are attracted to me. No sooner than I snooze & loose a real nice one, I run across another one with many if not all early features.....correct flip sight, Type 1 band, push safety AND stock with no rebuild mark. There is a ghost of a cartouche on the right and a strong SH-B in the slingwell. I didn't get a chance to tear into it today, but I will tomorrow. This could really be one of those proverbial "duffle-bag carbines".

    The downside? Lots of finish wear. Stock may have been partially sanded and varnished. The barely readable 12/43 dated Underwood barrel has a MW of 2, which ain't bad. Basically this is a rack grade SP, most likely with all the original correct parts and no providence to prove its heritage, and it sure has a patina that is very long in the making. Asking $900, will sell for $700.

    This might be a no-brainer to everybody here, but $700 is not a small sum of money this time of the year following a major car repair and the purchase of a Bavarian Rural Police w/flip.

    Anybody see any reason (other than that pesky money thing) I shouldn't jump on this like dirty on a hog?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Standard Products M1 - value?
    By glock26ph in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-22-2009, 07:25 PM
  2. Hi Standard
    By hirsca in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-10-2009, 04:30 PM
  3. Standard Products Marking?
    By glock26ph in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-10-2009, 12:00 AM
  4. Hi-Standard k-120 riot
    By roosterinalabamy in forum Military Shotguns
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-14-2009, 03:40 PM
  5. Standard carbine
    By A. F Medic in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-28-2009, 08:05 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts