Peter,when you previously said ".......the No32 were to fit into the rear dovetail due to the different eye relief of the No32 sight..... as shown in the drawings." I persued the 'as shown in the drawings' bit for my transposing scope/brackets onto body drawings.
As previous Bren and scope DDE's (for the Pattern 1918, Watson & Weaver Telescope and Telescope, Detachable. Applied to Bren .303" Mk 1 along with Telescope Sighting No. 32 Mk 1 Applied to Bren .303" -in Mk 1 (Bracket) )also indicate that the scope bracket was to fit the front dovetail as per the DDE SK drawing with the rear end of the scope in line or slightly further forward of the drum sight apperture upstand. Why did no one tell the design department at Enfield the optimum datum point for the scope to be placed before drawing commenced ?

Using the eye relief distance for the drum sight apperture and then making the nessasary adjustment for the difference in the 32 scope eye relief would have given my wife an easy time of working out the placement point !........and thats not much of a compliment.

OK, you are probably going to say it's not as simple as that , but it seems to have taken allot of drawings and time to find out they had got it wrong.

As a matter of interest what is the eye relief for a 32 scope assuming 20/20 vision (as I'm never likely to own one and my eyes are naff anyway) ?

........and when is the book going to be published ?

ATB Kevin