-
Contributing Member
No4 serial Number
I just received this No4. The paperwork says it is a Mk II . It came in a Big 5 box listing the original sale price as $139.99. It appears that the rifle has not been fired since it was placed in the box (lots of dust, all of the lubricants have solidified into sludge, moving parts difficult to move, etc.). The serial number listed on the box matches the number on the receiver above the import mark, but there is a different number on the left wrist. Can anyone advise why there are 2 numbers and which one is the actual serial number? Thank you for you assistance.
Attachment 115509Attachment 115510
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
03-02-2021 04:11 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Contributing Member
Also, can someone please advise what the this attachment below the front barrel band is for? Thanks again!
Attachment 115511Attachment 115513
-
-
-
Legacy Member
The "CC" number on the buttsocket is the original manufacturers serial number.
It was manufactured by Royal Ordnance Factory Fazakerley (Nr Liverpool England)
It has an "A" suffix which shows that somewhere on the rifle is a non-standard part which had to be hand fitted.
The Fazakerley quality control was not good so things like 'holes drilled out the wrong size' was not unusual.
The 'number' on the side of the body was probably a serial number issued by the importer who didn't know where to look for the 'proper' number.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
-
Contributing Member
Thank you sir! Any ideas reference the the attachment below the muzzle?
-
-
Legacy Member
That device is a non British Military modification used as a piling swivel to stack rifles in groups of 3 standing up.
-
-
Agree with Bindi. I'm not sure, but suspect I may have read somewhere that the Turks used them.
-
-
Contributing Member
I'd have a gecko at the draws as in pic #2 there is a longitudal crack heading forwards in front of the tie plate, may be nothing but still worth having a look.
-
-
Advisory Panel
Originally Posted by
Singer B
I just received this No4. The paperwork says it is a Mk II . . .
The tie-plate and receiver marking "No4 Mk1 ROF(F)" indicate this rifle is a Mk1, not a Mk2.
-
-
Advisory Panel
Flog it and find one without those fugly import markings is my advice.
Pull that silly projection off and the muzzle band can at least be reset between the pins and tightened properly.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same.
-
-
Legacy Member
I suspect the addition of a piling swivel, (or rod in this case) makes the rifle likely to be one of those released by the Italian navy a couple of years ago.
-