+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: 1942 Savage MkI Project

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

tlvaughn 1942 Savage MkI Project 01-31-2011, 07:25 PM
Rumpelhardt Very nice work. I just did... 01-31-2011, 07:37 PM
spinecracker Nice work. I recently went... 01-31-2011, 09:37 PM
me2 VERY NICE restoration! I can... 01-31-2011, 10:06 PM
Mohawk Very Nice resto. I grew up... 02-03-2011, 03:37 AM
spinecracker Question - how... 05-17-2011, 10:08 PM
tlvaughn Savage made approx. 123,500... 05-18-2011, 07:02 AM
Peter Laidler Talking of Savage No4's, has... 05-18-2011, 07:15 AM
tlvaughn I have 0C15326 (1,015,326)... 05-18-2011, 07:37 AM
Peter Laidler TLV, no, it was a thin... 05-18-2011, 09:13 AM
tlvaughn According to Ian's book, the... 05-18-2011, 01:47 PM
D-BOMB Very nice rifle! I have a 44'... 05-18-2011, 03:15 PM
  1. #1
    Legacy Member tlvaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last On
    08-13-2022 @ 05:30 PM
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    340
    Local Date
    08-14-2025
    Local Time
    10:46 PM

    1942 Savage MkI Project

    Below are a few pics of my 1942 Savage MkI project rifle. I had before pictures; however, I had to replace my hard drive last Friday after it crashed. A national electronics chain was unable to retrieve the data and told me it would cost over $2,000 to send it out. Luckily a friend of the family does this for a living and is confident that some data can still be retrieved.

    Enough about my computer. The bad news was that the somebody turned it into a sporter, so I had to replace all of the wood and most of the metal. The catch was missing and the backsight axis pin was broken. The good news was that the serial numbers on the receiver, bolt and magazine all matched (although the magazine is a replacement).

    I know that not all of the parts are 100% correct; however, it is in much better shape today than when I rec'd it.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. Thank You to tlvaughn For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Legacy Member Rumpelhardt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last On
    10-20-2024 @ 12:40 PM
    Location
    U.S. Maine
    Age
    66
    Posts
    411
    Local Date
    08-14-2025
    Local Time
    10:46 PM
    Very nice work. I just did the same thing with a 1941 Long Branch so I can relate. Very injoyable past time.
    Last edited by Rumpelhardt; 01-31-2011 at 07:41 PM.

  4. #3
    Legacy Member spinecracker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last On
    08-18-2023 @ 08:38 AM
    Location
    Cheyenne, WY, USA
    Posts
    870
    Local Date
    08-14-2025
    Local Time
    07:46 PM
    Nice work. I recently went through the same thing with a 1941 Long Branch. Although a restored rifle may never have the same financial value as one that had never been messed with in the first place, the enjoyment and true value must be in saving another rifle for future generations and the effort to overturn the acts of bubba (or, in my case, years of service in Indonesia)

  5. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    me2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    02-23-2012 @ 01:03 PM
    Posts
    175
    Local Date
    08-14-2025
    Local Time
    10:46 PM
    VERY NICE restoration! I can chime in on this thread cause all 5 of my #4's came to me via "Bubba". Nice thing about it they are all matching except the wood and two magazines. They all arrived in the US before the mandatory import stamp came about. All the metal bits I had to replace are correct for each maker. I have a theory about the early Bubba rifles in that Bubba used them for hunting principally and because of most game laws, had to use modern sporting ammo in them which in turn kept the bores in near new condition provided he at least gave them minimal cleaning. Also, the price is usually way below what some dealers want to sell as original rifles....show me the provenance.
    Your wood is really attractive. Did you get a whole set or find the parts separately?

  6. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Mohawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Last On
    08-01-2011 @ 02:15 AM
    Location
    Western US
    Posts
    148
    Local Date
    08-14-2025
    Local Time
    07:46 PM
    Very Nice resto. I grew up near the Chicopee Falls Plant where these were made. Had a 1942 dated one. Was a fine shooter. Had to sell due to a divorce. Have never found another like it. Enjoy, and don't forget to take that lovely lady to the range to shoot her. After all, that is what they are made for.....

  7. #6
    Legacy Member spinecracker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last On
    08-18-2023 @ 08:38 AM
    Location
    Cheyenne, WY, USA
    Posts
    870
    Local Date
    08-14-2025
    Local Time
    07:46 PM
    Question - how common/uncommon are the Savage 1942 No.4 Mk.1s?

  8. #7
    Legacy Member tlvaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last On
    08-13-2022 @ 05:30 PM
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    340
    Local Date
    08-14-2025
    Local Time
    10:46 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by spinecracker View Post
    Question - how common/uncommon are the Savage 1942 No.4 Mk.1s?
    Savage made approx. 123,500 +/- 1942 MkI's. It is not something you will see everyday, but they can be found. In the past 45 days, I have seen approx. 5 for sale.

  9. #8
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 09:03 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,716
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    08-15-2025
    Local Time
    03:46 AM
    Talking of Savage No4's, has anyone got one of the last where the numbering flicked over from 99C9999 to start again so to speak at 0C - five numbers - 00001 and so on. The last one I know of is 0C38286. Numerically, this'll be rifle 1,038286

    I remember being told about this late changeover once then, lo and behold some time later, saw a little stick-in amendment in an Army technical information book as to why this had taken place

  10. #9
    Legacy Member tlvaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last On
    08-13-2022 @ 05:30 PM
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    340
    Local Date
    08-14-2025
    Local Time
    10:46 PM
    Thread Starter
    I have 0C15326 (1,015,326) and 0C43299 (1,043,299). The highest s/n I have seen to date is 0C63110 (1,063,110).

    PL - Does it state why they went to 0Cxxxxx instead of 100Cxxxx?
    Last edited by tlvaughn; 05-18-2011 at 08:15 AM.

  11. #10
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 09:03 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,716
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    08-15-2025
    Local Time
    03:46 AM
    TLV, no, it was a thin wartime paper small-arms instruction that was sent to Quartermasters and he'd obviously pasted it into his copy of the Equipment regulations. It just gave warning to quartermasters that they should be aware that the usual format of serial numbers was changing to another format. To be honest, It's hardly a change of format, just a, well........, change!

    Do you know when the last rifles came off the Savage production line? Last serial numbers?

    My boss in New Zealandicon, Danny Booker (or was it Frank Seeley....?) told me that at the end of the war, there was a big cull over New Zealand and the Commonwealth generally to draw in all of the Savage lend lease rifles (and everything else lend lease too......) as they were to be returned to the USAicon. Initially they were stored at a big Ordnance Depot at Palmerston North ready for return but shipping was at a premium and when things hotted up in Malaya and Korea they were left in situ and used.

    That's apparently the reason why so many Savage rifles ended up back in the US during the 50's. Otherwise these little skint nations would have had to pay for them. The UKicon kept zillions and paid but I don't recall the Chinese having paid as of yet! Maybe I missed it........

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 1942 Savage No4Mk1T Auction (pics)
    By Riflechair in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-03-2010, 01:43 AM
  2. 1942 Lee Enfield Savage
    By yyj200 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-01-2009, 10:33 PM
  3. 1942 No.4 Mk1*(T) Savage Sniper Rifle (less scope)
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-13-2008, 02:46 PM
  4. 1942 Savage No.4 Mk1*(T)
    By Badger in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-26-2007, 08:08 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Loading...