Good afternoon,
New member here, and also a new Enfield owner. I'm primarily a casual collector of M1 Garands (and other US arms) and I also shoot NRA HP and CMPSR, occasionally with the M1 though primarily these days with an AR.
I recently got bitten by the Enfield bug and to make a long-ish story short, was fortunate enough to acquire my first one through Brian Dick... a beautiful 1945 Long Branch. What an awesome rifle! I'm really quite pleased with it and owe Brian thanks for setting me up with my first one. First of a few, probably.
Took it out yesterday for a test-firing; it's definitely a little "different" than the M1's and AR's I'm used to, but after a few tries I'm starting to get the hang of it. Front sight required a bit of windage adjustment, per Peter Laidler's postings I just gave it a couple gentle taps with drift & hammer and it lined right up... easy enough.
The attached pic is my fourth grouping:
Attachment 77735
10 shots @ 100 yards, SR-1 target, HXP '69 ammo, from the prone position using a USGI web sling set up single-point i.e. with a loop. The low 7 was called low. Seeing the full circumference band and knowing a little about how the rifle is stocked I was cautious with the sling pressure, and found it responded best to light pressure, not nearly as tight as I'm used to with the US service rifles, but comfortable and stable enough. I also modified my leg positioning to get a little lower behind the rifle.
Used a 6'o'clock hold, which is what I'm used to with the M1 and AR at all but the 600 yd line. MkIII leaf sight at the 200 yd setting, the pamphlet on sight settings doesn't lie, POI is about 2-3" higher than POA when using the 200-yd setting at 100 yds! Also, I was really impressed with the trigger; as good if not a nicer 2-stage than my best M1 trigger.
I'm looking forward to learning more about these and obviously shooting them more! I was really pretty happy with that grouping; I'd have been pleased to do that with an M1, too.
Thanks and regards,
Alex M.
Oregon, USA
Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.