-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
POF NO 4 T rifles
Can someone shed some light on this type of T rifle what is the story on them ?
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
11-15-2017 09:20 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
rbiron
Can someone shed some light on this type of T rifle what is the story on them ?
I'm sure that Pakistan got No4MkI(T) rifles at and after partition, just like India. They certainly manufactured No4MkI & No4Mk2 rifles during the 1950s and possibly into the early '60s.
I've never seen a No4"T" rifle which showed manufacture by them.
However about 10-15 years ago LARGE quantities of POF
replacement wood sets (mostly nice walnut) came onto the commercial market, and have been used to "restore" and repair lacking rifles (including No4T's).
-
The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Lee Enfield For This Useful Post:
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Ya it is definitely a 44 BSA rifle [M47C] has no POF
rebuild markings but the cheek piece looks like it has been on there for a very long time all the bands and wood is marked POF 58 pads looks like they have been on there for a very long time also. mount and scope are repo.
Would it be worth anything close to the $2500 CA he is asking?

Originally Posted by
Lee Enfield
I'm sure that Pakistan got No4MkI(T) rifles at and after partition, just like India. They certainly manufactured No4MkI & No4Mk2 rifles during the 1950s and possibly into the early '60s.
I've never seen a No4"T" rifle which showed manufacture by them.
However about 10-15 years ago LARGE quantities of POF replacement wood sets (mostly nice walnut) came onto the commercial market, and have been used to "restore" and repair lacking rifles (including No4T's).
-
Contributing Member
It all gets down to the condition of the rifle & its bore if your happy to have repo bracket/scope ( repo scopes apparently do not have a good reliability track record) set up then I guess it is reasonable but I do reiterate the condition of the bore plus the rest of the mechanical's are whats important when I got my T '44 M47C yes all looked good except the draws were flogged to bu**ery and back again.
You need to check it over or at least get some pictures detailing all the stamping's a look at the rifling & muzzle, so the real knowledgeable persons he can at least give an opinion on it.
Its so very hard for them not being able to hold & examine the weapon.
Remember,
Buying something has 2 rules;
A) How much you want the item.
B) How deep your pockets are to acquire the item.
-
-
Contributing Member
Cinders; I would also add:
C) Why are they selling it.
-
Thank You to 30Three For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
You need to post pictures with detail for the good gentlemen here to help you.
MJ, don't take this personally, but that's crap.
muffett.2008

-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
rbiron
Can someone shed some light on this type of T rifle what is the story on them ?
Would this be one posted for sale recently up here? I saw one recently but can't remember which website and the only things Pakistani on it appeared to be bands and, maybe, other minor bits. It appeared to be a kosher BSA-based "T".
Ridolpho
-
-
Agree with Jack. If you can get us a few photo's you'll be snowed under in advice.
-
Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Tried to do pics but unable. I'm 100% sure of what it is I was mistaken on markings on the wood only POF
markings are on the butt painted on ser. match on forestock , butt , bolt , & receiver. TR marked on L/S wrist no mid screw a guy could easily bring it back to BSA spec when it became a T rifle by just cleaning it up and replacing the bands. You would be stuck with a repo scope & mount unless you found a real one but could live with it.
-
Legacy Member
Here is a shot of our Indian T with the ID moved to the receiver ring.

I have only seen two others like this.
MJ, don't take this personally, but that's crap.
muffett.2008

-