-
\The FTR55 on the top left side of the body was the BSA mark. They did thousands for foreign governments under the Aid for XYZ agreements or the Crown Agents programme. We'd occasionally see them marked like that when they came through thge system from other nations but never saw a UK MoD one. Our FTR's were all Fazakerley or occasionally, Enfield, marked exactly as per the Faz FTR spec.
The Nic (is that Nicosia ?) CYP (is that Cyprus?) isn't one of ours
-
-
01-11-2011 07:49 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
It is indeed, but I dont know if it was Police or Military. I had a unmarked No.4/5 conversion a while back but it was a rough pig so it went to a new home.
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Does anyone need to see any more photos? I am not really comfortable taking the gun apart, so that may have to wait a few daysuntil I can take it out to my local shooting center. Thanks for the help so far.
-
Advisory Panel
\The FTR55 on the top left side of the body was the BSA mark. They did thousands for foreign governments under the Aid for XYZ agreements or the Crown Agents programme. We'd occasionally see them marked like that when they came through thge system from other nations but never saw a
UK MoD one. Our FTR's were all Fazakerley or occasionally, Enfield, marked exactly as per the Faz FTR spec.
The Nic (is that Nicosia ?) CYP (is that Cyprus?) isn't one of ours
Wasn't NIC/CYP previously identified as the work of an Australian (Sydney-based?) gunsmith?
There are loads of civvie-created No5s around, both No4 bodies milled to look like No5 bodies, and many where they didn't bother. At the moment, there is someone in UK having a good (yet so far unsuccessful) go at faking up electro-pencil markings..... caveat emptor....
-
-
I just thought that the NIC CYP marks were a bit too modern. Done with a pantograph but using a what we called 'scratchy-pen' instead of rotating cutters.
I don't ever recall anyone numbering the main body with the little electric pencil. All we used that for was numbering the breech blocks and carriers/ piston extensions and No2/L9 pistol barrels. Is that your take on the electric pencil Tankie and Skippy? Big workshops always use the Taylor Hobson pantograph engravers with spinning cutters and not scratchy pens
We also used it to mark gauges too but it was a crap mewthod of marking as the electric arc effect only penetrated to about half a micron deep!
-
-
Legacy Member
I only ever used the electric pencil on parts that had been changed (breech blocks , carriers). NEVER for the master serial numbers (on the bodies)
the serial numbers on GPMGs and SLRs breech blocks didn't last long if done with the electric pen due to the rubbing on the rounds in the magazine/belt
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
In the event that I get my Mk5 disassembled, are there any particular things you need photos of?
-
Legacy Member
Lightening cuts in the barrel. You should see the upper ones after removing only the handguard.
-
-
I wouldn't bother Clarkie, it's most probably genuine. Just go out and enjoy it
-
-
Deceased January 15th, 2016
Originally Posted by
clarkmilitaria
In the event that I get my Mk5 disassembled, are there any particular things you need photos of?
Be careful not to confuse your "Marks" with your "Numbers". A Jungle Carbine is a Rifle, No.5 Mk.1. Very different to a Rifle, No.1 Mk.V.
Last edited by Beerhunter; 01-12-2011 at 05:25 AM.