Closed Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Export news from the USA

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Advisory Panel Brian Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    04-03-2025 @ 05:07 PM
    Location
    Edgefield, SC USA
    Posts
    4,116
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    08:32 AM
    Thread Starter
    Claven2, I really don't know if rifles marked .223 Remington and .308 Winchester will be exempt. There has always been a problem if the rifle was a current or recently obsolete military variant like the M40 or M24 sniper rifles which are just Remington 700 short andf long action rifles respectively. As far as the M1A and AR-15 variants, it's not going to happen. I'vce been round and round exporting AR components over the past couple of years with some success and some not! It's all a bit tiring sometimes considering all the crime we're stopping.

    Spinecracker, There are no restrictions on the import of the rifles you mentioned as long as they're on the U.S. Curio & Relics list which all except the L39A1 are.

    Bearhunter, I don't know where you're coming from saying that there's no government control on the import or sale of said firearms and ammunition. No offense, but that's simply mythology perpetrated by the media. The USAicon has the most restrictive import/export laws in the world. They're much more restrictive than Englandicon or Canadaicon so lets lay that mythology to rest for good. Believe me, I live it on a daily basis.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Legacy Member bearhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    08-16-2024 @ 02:46 PM
    Location
    Okanogan, BC
    Posts
    509
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    05:32 AM
    Brian, I see a lot of ads, for firearms and ammunition in the US. Much of which we can only wish for in Canadaicon. I understand where you are coming from and lets get this clear from the get go, I respect your opinion. After all, you are a lot closer to this than I am.
    On the other hand, are there any limitations on importing and selling 7.62x51 and several other milsurp cartridges in the USAicon. I know, you have problems with importing Chinese firearms as well as some ammunition, like 7.62x39. In Canada, there has been a drought on milsurp ammunition, other than 7.62x39 and we have access to Chinese firearms.
    Other than that, there are few, visible to us, restrictions on ammunition and firearms, that are available to the average law abiding citizen of the US. To us, we don't like the export restrictions that are being imposed upon you by your government, because it deprives us of a ready source of shootable and collectible ammunition. It also deprives us, of some of the very good services, you and other businesses in the US provide.
    The statement I made previously, was a question, more than a declaration. Other than export, have sales of 5.56,7.62x51 and 50cal, weapons and ammunition, been limited in any way in the US, by federal edict? I am under the impression, that can't be done without agreement of both the congress and the senate.
    That, isn't the case in Canada. We have bureaucracies that seem to be able to act independently, concerning such decisions. Is that similar to your situation in the US?

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Senior Moderator
    (Founding Partner)


    Site Founder
    Claven2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:25 PM
    Location
    Scandaltown, Ontario
    Posts
    3,284
    Real Name
    Ronald
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    08:32 AM
    Careful everyone - discussion about what the law does and does not mean is ok, but as much as I hate the UN, treading too much int the political side of this news is against forum rules and I don't want to have to invigilate this thread.
    Союз нерушимый республик свободных Сплотила навеки Великая Русь. Да здравствует созданный волей народов Единый, могучий Советский Союз!

  6. #4
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,008
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    05:32 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Claven2 View Post
    Careful everyone - discussion about what the law does and does not mean is ok, but as much as I hate the UN, treading too much int the political side of this news is against forum rules and I don't want to have to invigilate this thread.
    I was just looking through the FAQ, but I couldn't find any reference to what subjects are permitted and which are not

    Could someone post a link to same or reproduce here?

    Heaven knows I don't want to engage in any "bad speak", though I can't promise not to engage in "bad-think".
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  7. #5
    Deceased August 2nd, 2014 John R.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last On
    11-01-2013 @ 05:42 PM
    Location
    Vancouver B.C.,
    Posts
    159
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    05:32 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Claven2 View Post
    Careful everyone - discussion about what the law does and does not mean is ok, but as much as I hate the UN, treading too much int the political side of this news is against forum rules and I don't want to have to invigilate this thread.
    When I see heavy handed comments like this with implied THREATS I start giving serious thought to asking for a refund of my contribution and exiting stage left.

    I STRONGLY suggest that you look up the definition of POLITICS instead of this demanding that the rest of us kowtow to YOUR definition of the word!

  8. #6
    Legacy Member enfield303t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    12-05-2022 @ 02:54 PM
    Location
    Okanagan BC
    Posts
    1,166
    Real Name
    Donald
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    04:32 AM
    On the serious side some institutions should go extinct. You know it is ludicrous to ban a firearm or cartridge on the premise of military numbers. Then I guess ammo makers will have to stop making some of the military cartridges and make them in the sporting versions. Change the numbers and make everyone happy.
    Last edited by enfield303t; 09-15-2010 at 08:06 PM. Reason: To change my post from BORDERLINE political..I THINK
    Why use a 50 pound bomb when a 500 pound bomb will do?

  9. #7
    Legacy Member enfield303t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    12-05-2022 @ 02:54 PM
    Location
    Okanagan BC
    Posts
    1,166
    Real Name
    Donald
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    04:32 AM
    I have decided to move to the Falkland Islands, bearhunter are you going to join me?? Sheep we could raise sheep !
    Why use a 50 pound bomb when a 500 pound bomb will do?

  10. #8
    Administrator

    Site Owner
    Badger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Age
    76
    Posts
    12,986
    Real Name
    Doug
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    08:32 AM
    My Videos in Video Club
    12

    Exclamation

    Good morning John …

    Easy now partner …

    Ron (Claven2) is just doing his job, it's not personal and he's simply enforcing the site rules.

    When a visitor first signs up to become a Registered Member of the Military Surplus Collectors Forums, they responded "I AGREE" to an on-line contract (click here), in order to become a Registered Member. Unfortunately, this agreement never appears anywhere on the system after that, so just in case anyone ever needs to reference what they agreed to, here is the contract that's been acknowledged:

    Forum Rules (click here)

    Registration to Military Surplus Collectors Forums is free! This site is designed to encourage the open exchange of information amongst the general military surplus collector community, thereby helping all of our members to better enjoy their chosen hobby. It's not a venue for discussing the politics of firearms ownership or the practices and policies of various governments trying to control them. We do insist that you abide by the rules and policies detailed below. If you agree to the terms, please check the 'I agree' checkbox and press the 'Register' button below. If you would like to cancel the registration, click here to return to the forums index.

    Please note that once you register and create posting content, we will be unable to delete your registered name and posted content without affecting other members and the coherency of our database. Therefore, if you decide not to use this site in the future, simply delete your bookmark pointing to this site and do not log in any more, however, all existing past content will remain accessible.

    Although the administrators and moderators of Military Surplus Collectors Forums will attempt to keep all objectionable messages off this forum, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the author, and neither the owners of Military Surplus Collectors Forums, nor Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (developers of vBulletin) will be held responsible for the content of any message.

    By agreeing to these rules, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-oriented, anti-Semitic, discriminatory, hateful, threatening, bigoted, or otherwise violative of any laws.

    This is a private site, not a public right of access. The owners of Military Surplus Collectors Forums reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason, as well as BAN anyone from accessing Military Surplus Collectors Forums. In addition, the owners wish to maintain a site with an active membership, who participate in the forums and use the Milsurp Knowledge Libraryicon regularly. As a result, the membership database may periodically be purged of members who have not logged in within the last six months.

    I have read, and agree to abide by the Military Surplus Collectors Forums rules.
    I do understand your sensitivity to perceived censorship, but it has absolutely nothing to do with that. Actually, if the truth be told, you and I would probably stand shoulder to shoulder and agree on 99.9% of any political rhetoric and discussions if permitted to be posted here, but that's not the mandate of our site, which is supposed to be purely about collecting old milsurps and enjoying a hobby we all love.

    There are enough other gun sites on the Internet with publicly accessible forums (you don't have to even register) which are about politics, Obama, Muslims, immigration, ugly looking women democrats and other silly nonsense, often generated by the same un-moderated loose cannons sharing their frustrations in the same sandbox. That stuff can spread like wildfire and destroy the unity of a site (except for the chosen few) very quickly, so I simply don't want to see it get any kind of foothold here.

    I was personally disappointed to see you express your desire to leave our site and go elsewhere, as you do help and provide a lot of information to old and novice collectors alike, which I know is appreciated, however, if you feel strongly enough about the need to vent politically here and that's a barrier to you enjoying everything else we offer, then you will be missed.

    This particular post is now closed. I felt that although it was referencing rules about governments trying to control firearms and was a little on the border of a political discussion, that it's content posted by Brian Dickicon was valuable and important for the community to understand in relation to some categories of old milsurps and how it could affect their collecting hobby with the inability to import and export vis-a-vis the U.S.

    That point has been made and it's apparent to me that as always happens and the reason we have the no politics rule in the first place, this thread is heading toward becoming loaded with vitriol and highly divisive, so it ends here …

    Thanks Brian.. on behalf of the entire membership, notwithstanding how it ended, we do appreciate the heads up posting of this thread.

    Regards,
    Doug

  11. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Badger For This Useful Post:


Closed Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Did Canada export L1 receivers to the UK?
    By Longshaor in forum FNFAL Rifles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-20-2010, 07:43 PM
  2. Sad news re: J. L. Jones
    By Badger in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-16-2010, 10:47 AM
  3. All please read, sad news.
    By 5thBatt in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-24-2010, 10:04 AM
  4. Export from US of No. 32 Scope
    By Talking Warrior in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-26-2010, 09:49 AM
  5. Interesting News!
    By John Kepler in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-06-2009, 10:19 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts