+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Please help with WRA finishes

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Newscotlander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    11-21-2019 @ 08:29 PM
    Location
    NY, ruled by the tyrant, Andrew Cuomo - the least freest, highest taxed, most corrupt state in Union
    Posts
    199
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    04:31 AM
    how would you classify the receiver finish on my WRA?
    Original, but worn.

    Mine and FTD,s are so close, but his finish is greener, but seems like the logo, and serial numbers on FTD's are more filled in with whatever finish it has??
    FTD's may be refinished. The color doesn't look right. I would have to see more photos.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member DaveHH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-22-2024 @ 04:12 PM
    Location
    Northern Calif
    Posts
    1,348
    Real Name
    David Haynes
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    04:31 AM
    Here is good original Winchester color. This is a 5.6, Mar 1944
    Last edited by Badger; 02-20-2011 at 07:59 AM.

  3. #3
    Legacy Member Garandrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-19-2025 @ 11:10 PM
    Location
    Conn.
    Posts
    756
    Real Name
    Andy Gordon
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    05:31 AM
    Thread Starter
    I didnt want to state that to FTD, but it looked funny to me too...mine supposedly was used by a Marine in the So. Pacific. I have the original bill of sale, and the gun shop owner told me it came in from an ex-Marine who was in the pacific in WW2

  4. #4
    Legacy Member Garandrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-19-2025 @ 11:10 PM
    Location
    Conn.
    Posts
    756
    Real Name
    Andy Gordon
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    05:31 AM
    Thread Starter
    Brian, does that green from the acid rinse wear out? Here a comparison between barrel/receiver

  5. #5
    Legacy Member BrianQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-21-2022 @ 04:50 PM
    Posts
    466
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    05:31 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Garandrew View Post
    Brian, does that green from the acid rinse wear out?
    No, but the finish wears.

  6. #6
    Legacy Member Bubba-7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-27-2023 @ 08:25 PM
    Location
    Just North of Fort Benning
    Posts
    503
    Real Name
    Roger
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    05:31 AM
    $240.00 in 1980 is like $480 in 1990, $960.00 in 2000, and $1,920.00 in 2010 dollars.

  7. #7
    Advisory Panel
    painter777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Central Michigan
    Posts
    5,493
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    05:31 AM
    Great example Dave,

    Do you think the lube hole was added while in service? (WWII era)

    I ask because I have a W code Underwood that looks to have had just the lube oil added, but still has the flip rear sight and Type I barrel band.
    Other than the lube hole, looks to be original finish with expected wear found on the metal where it contacts the stock...etc.

    Charlie
    Last edited by painter777; 01-19-2011 at 11:15 AM. Reason: Add question

  8. #8
    Legacy Member DaveHH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-22-2024 @ 04:12 PM
    Location
    Northern Calif
    Posts
    1,348
    Real Name
    David Haynes
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    04:31 AM

    Hi Charlie

    A very, very, very good source offered an opinion that this carbine shows no signs of a rebuild. There is also a known example very close in number to this one that is a "mirror image" right down to the Underwood recoil plate. So it may very well be that the type five TH came into use earlier than thought. The variations are not surprising as the recent Winchester featured in the CC newsletter was made on probably the same day as this one and had no oil hole and a flip sight. Both have type 2 bands. I've owned this carbine a long time, nothing has been changed and as mentioned it is all Winchester except for the Underwood recoil plate which etched the wood and appears original to the stock (it was extraordinarily hard to get out as well).
    Thanks Charlie

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Remington 1903 transitional rifle parts finishes
    By jarrodeu in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-14-2010, 01:58 AM
  2. GI finishes NOS parts and refinished items
    By byronroland in forum The Restorer's Corner
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-19-2010, 04:22 PM
  3. metal finishes on sks
    By big bear in forum Soviet Bloc Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-05-2010, 11:00 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts