+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: No name carbine?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Legacy Member kar66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last On
    05-30-2024 @ 02:09 PM
    Location
    California, Mo.
    Posts
    141
    Local Date
    06-21-2024
    Local Time
    10:07 AM

    4,4 npm

    I didn't think of it when doing last reply. But I have a 4,4 NPM too. Mine is 4,426,5-- with a U bbl. also. In fact most of it's parts are the same as you have with yours down to the U trigger. Except mine came with some kind of a v notch rear sight, it looked home made.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #12
    Legacy Member BrianQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-21-2022 @ 04:50 PM
    Posts
    466
    Local Date
    06-21-2024
    Local Time
    11:07 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Hollinger View Post
    So what do you think happened here Brian?
    It just didn't get stamped with the manufacturer info. It's not the first one that got out without it.

  4. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to BrianQ For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #13
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    topaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last On
    04-25-2019 @ 03:10 PM
    Posts
    193
    Local Date
    06-21-2024
    Local Time
    11:07 AM
    I don`t think it would have pass inspection .(That Way) some thing is not right,everything was recorded. maybe a misfit. Not trying to knock it, but you have to ask why. Its not in any books by the experts, so what is it. one of a kind , If it could talk.... Good luck

  7. #14
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    TRICKSTER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    03-15-2016 @ 06:28 PM
    Location
    CA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    59
    Local Date
    06-21-2024
    Local Time
    08:07 AM
    Thread Starter
    I think I'll go with the possibility that this is a Commercial Controls carbine. A guy can dream can't he.
    Thanks to all who posted info here.

  8. #15
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ChipS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-29-2017 @ 04:55 PM
    Posts
    367
    Local Date
    06-21-2024
    Local Time
    11:07 AM
    It looks to me like the manufacturer name (NPM?) and serial number have been ground off and a new serial number stamped back on. I can clearly see the edge of the grind near the left edge of the receiver and I think I can see the left leg of the 'N' and maybe a shadow of the 'Postal Meter' below it. I dont think NPM stamped most of their receivers very deep. Something else, I have NPM 4.24M and the '4' font isn't even close to the the one shown, in both size and style. Anybody have one closer to compare? Plus the first '4' in the pic is really ragged - hardly discernable as a '4'. Like somebody had a hard time getting his overstrike to match part of the original number that was too close to the edge to grind off. That's the way I see it.

  9. #16
    Legacy Member BrianQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-21-2022 @ 04:50 PM
    Posts
    466
    Local Date
    06-21-2024
    Local Time
    11:07 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by ChipS View Post
    I have NPM 4.24M and the '4' font isn't even close to the the one shown, in both size and style. Anybody have one closer to compare? Plus the first '4' in the pic is really ragged - hardly discernable as a '4'.
    Your 4.24M was made at least four months after this 4.42M receiver was. The font style and size on the no name receiver is consistent with NPMs made during the same time frame.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-07-2010, 12:01 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts