+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: No. 4 Mk1/2 Sear lugs bedding

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Contributing Member muffett.2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 05:27 AM
    Location
    Scone, NSW. Australia
    Posts
    2,205
    Real Name
    kevin muffett
    Local Date
    08-15-2025
    Local Time
    10:16 AM
    I went through this process earlier in the year, started with 2 No.1 and 1 No.4 receivers and rebuilt complete rifles using parts aquired.
    These 3 rifles were assembled using Peters articles, This work is on a thread called "It's Time" on the gunboards forum, each one of these rifles was capable of groups of 1inch at 100 yards by the time they were completed, this is with the bedding techniques on wood and groups obtained back to 300yds all recorded.
    Tbone has also been through this process recently, his articles can be found also, both he and I used Peters information, maybe added a little of our own to get the end results, they do work.

    I see where you are coming from with your need to deepen the draw area.
    Normally this is a sign that the action is seated too low in the forewood, the timber either having been crushed down or cut too low originally.
    It may have been easier to build up the seat area rather than deepen, the draws are a relatively weak area as it is, by building up you negate the need to shorten the spacer and continually trim wood to get the necessary clearances, its not to late to rectify, as long as you haven't started to carve out the front barrel channel yet.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #12
    Legacy Member Gnr527's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    01-11-2025 @ 05:48 AM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    146
    Local Date
    08-15-2025
    Local Time
    12:16 AM
    Thread Starter
    Peter/Muffett
    Not sure I have been through all your articles but have had a good trawl through and am still fourpence short of a shilling.
    I would, in my simple terms, describe the mechanics of a stock-up as follows:-
    a) The action/barrel can be likened to the unbending plank of an unequal see-saw with the short leg of the plank (from screw to sear lugs) being 4½” and the long leg (from screw to muzzle) being 22” (i.e. approx 5x).
    b) The pivot point is the screw collar.
    c) A complication is the addition of the reinforce 1” long set 1” along the long leg and of a height very close to that of the pivot.
    d) If the sear lug end lowers (or rises) by say .010” the pivot will produce a raising (or lowering) of the muzzle of approx .050”.
    e) Any reduction of the pivot height will reduce the height of the muzzle relative to the sear lugs.
    f) A good bedding of the fore end to the butt socket is achieved by the sloping cam action of the draws faces sliding down the cut draws on the fore end.
    g) A good ‘stock-up’ is achieved when:-
    i. The cam action of the draws forces the fore-end uniformly into the butt socket
    ii. The height of the pivot fixing tightly grips the fore end between trigger guard and action front without crushing wood.
    iii. The action is firmly held in the fore end without unequal side pressure.
    iv. The barrel base is firmly supported at reinforce – this should closely relate to the height of the adjacent screw fixing so they act in concert.
    v. The height of the muzzle is such that it exerts the required downwards pressure (3 – 7lbs in a No.4 and circa ½lb in a No.9) on the fore end.
    vi. The barrel is otherwise free of fore end and hand guards.
    My No.9 had been stocked up with an unused stock and it looked as if the only work done had been to fit the faces of the draws to ensure a good socket fit. Otherwise bearing was to the feet of the sear lugs, a tight screw of trigger guard onto collar(and thus guard onto fore end), and an 11lb muzzle bearing(also possibly some bearing to the bottom and sides of the knox form in front of the reinforce) .
    In response to Peters comment I am certain that the depth of fore-end timber under the feet of the sear lugs was such that the body of the action was not bedded down hard onto the fore end. By relieving the timber under the lugs and fractionally (.030”) reducing the screw collar length I am still not quite bedded down at rear of action but have got light bedding at front of action and reinforce and a reduction in bedding pressure at the muzzle.
    If my logic is correct very careful/small gnats knacker adjustments to sear lug foot bedding and possibly screw collar length will enable me, with an equally careful muzzle bearing exercise, to play with different up-muzzle pressures.
    The alternative is that I have wasted a certain amount of time on a lot of old man’s b------s.
    In either event all advice gratefully received.

    John

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. No4 Restricted sights & bayonets lugs removed
    By Simon P in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-02-2011, 04:29 PM
  2. Is bedding recoil lugs possible?
    By RJW NZ in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-22-2011, 08:01 AM
  3. bedding the ol H barrel? Plus a bedding material Q
    By RJW NZ in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-04-2010, 08:44 AM
  4. trigger guard lugs on bm59
    By goo in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-06-2009, 10:41 AM
  5. Does anyone repair trigger guard lugs?
    By NuJudge in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-31-2009, 01:18 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Loading...
Milsurps Voice Mail