+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30

Thread: "Deep hole" drilling problem - Inland receivers

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    firstflabn
    Guest firstflabn's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by ABPOS View Post
    any where in a receiver that you can see through would make me nervous.
    Might want to avoid all Quality Hardware receivers then. And don't drive over any bridges with a section of grating.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ABPOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last On
    01-09-2014 @ 01:35 PM
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Age
    53
    Posts
    617
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    12:04 AM
    I've got a Standard Products. Chicago has some of those grates over a bridge in town. I used to date this girl that was going to some school down there and I remember my car would kind of go left and right while going over that bridge. Meaning the grates seemed like they allowed the car to faintly "slide" from side to side. Didn't track well. It was always an uneasy feeling. hhehehhehe

  3. #3
    Legacy Member DaveHH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-22-2024 @ 04:12 PM
    Location
    Northern Calif
    Posts
    1,348
    Real Name
    David Haynes
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    01:04 AM

    Put a set of very high performance tires on a motorcycle

    (mine were 160 mph Continentals) and ride on freeway with rain grooves; it is like being on marbles. Perfectly safe. You might try reciting the 23rd psalm next time you cross a scary bridge, worked for me a couple of times in 1966-67.
    Consider how much work went into the receiver and think about wartime pressure to perform, none of these carbines was finished like a Model 12, more like a brick. I think that the actual finish was excessively fine for what it was. Look over the top of a carbine from about the top of the stock comb, not much lines up or is straight. It's not how it looks, it's how it worked.

    I'm probably totally wrong, but I think that this thing just went right through after an inspection to determine utility and was assembled.
    Last edited by DaveHH; 07-23-2012 at 07:25 PM.

  4. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ABPOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last On
    01-09-2014 @ 01:35 PM
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Age
    53
    Posts
    617
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    12:04 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by DaveHH View Post
    (mine were 160 mph Continentals) and ride on freeway with rain grooves; it is like being on marbles. Perfectly safe. You might try reciting the 23rd psalm next time you cross a scary bridge, worked for me a couple of times in 1966-67.
    Consider how much work went into the receiver and think about wartime pressure to perform, none of these carbines was finished like a Model 12, more like a brick. I think that the actual finish was excessively fine for what it was. Look over the top of a carbine from about the top of the stock comb, not much lines up or is straight. It's not how it looks, it's how it worked.

    I'm probably totally wrong, but I think that this thing just went right through after an inspection to determine utility and was assembled.
    I have a bunch of scripture memorized for anxiety. But I'm a work in progress. Not quite done yet.

  5. #5
    firstflabn
    Guest firstflabn's Avatar
    For anyone who has ever worked on fabricating something to a standard, this is pretty obvious. The question immediately becomes: does it meet specs or not? (Not to say humans don't miss things here and there.) Companies bid jobs based on time/cost/quality requirements as stated in contract documents - drawings, specs, standards, etc. No way that several people overlooked this anomaly.

    CCNLs vaguely mention Inland putting together an inspection manual for in-house use. Everybody - including the ordnance folks - liked it so much they saw to it that it was adopted by all makers. I would very much like to see that document. If it was a rare occurence, then you just put it in writing and send it to engineering to evaluate (and take respponsibility for).

    If I was the 1943 engineer I would ask if the recoil spring moved freely without any binding, and if OK, then direct that all sharp corners and rough edges be removed.

  6. #6
    Legacy Member jimb16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-10-2025 @ 06:29 PM
    Location
    N.E. Ohio
    Posts
    1,192
    Real Name
    James Barchok
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    02:04 AM
    There were specs for the amount of drillout that was allowable. That one is well within specs, so it got used. No big deal.
    When they tell you to behave, they always forget to specify whether to behave well or badly!

  7. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to jimb16 For This Useful Post:


  8. #7
    firstflabn
    Guest firstflabn's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by jimb16 View Post
    That one is well within specs
    Kindly tell us what those requirements are. Just saying that you've made the comparison doesn't really get us very far. If you ask me if I know what time it is, answering 'yes' would fall a bit short of a complete response.

  9. #8
    Moderator
    (Deceased Nov 16th, 2019)

    JimF4M1s (Deceased)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-01-2025 @ 05:49 PM
    Location
    USA
    Age
    76
    Posts
    3,439
    Local Date
    06-11-2025
    Local Time
    11:04 PM
    Jim,

    Are you able to share where you are finding the specs on the drill out tolerances? I would think that is of interest to many of us. Other parts as well.

    Thanks,

    Jim

    Quote Originally Posted by jimb16 View Post
    There were specs for the amount of drillout that was allowable. That one is well within specs, so it got used. No big deal.

  10. Thank You to JimF4M1s (Deceased) For This Useful Post:


  11. #9
    Legacy Member DaveHH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-22-2024 @ 04:12 PM
    Location
    Northern Calif
    Posts
    1,348
    Real Name
    David Haynes
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    01:04 AM

    Abpos

    If I opened a bible, it would catch on fire.

  12. #10
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ABPOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last On
    01-09-2014 @ 01:35 PM
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Age
    53
    Posts
    617
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    12:04 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by DaveHH View Post
    If I opened a bible, it would catch on fire.
    That went right over my head.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. inland philppines receivers imported federal ordnance
    By fungun1 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-04-2011, 01:01 PM
  2. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 02-28-2011, 06:01 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-11-2010, 01:33 PM
  4. USMC 1903's "Hatcher Hole"
    By SUB VET II in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-30-2009, 09:57 PM
  5. 1903A1 NM Hatcher Hole, bolt hole question......
    By 218bee in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-19-2009, 07:24 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts