+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Stock finish question

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Neal Myers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-07-2023 @ 08:25 PM
    Posts
    474
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    12:38 PM
    While the US military initially used linseed oilicon to finish stocks & handguards, at some point they changed to tung oil. The stock pictured is a WW2 replacement stock that I stripped & refinished with 3 coats of tung oil, rubbing with 0000 steel wool after each coat. The steel wool cuts the gloss & gives a matte finish.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member Bubba-7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-27-2023 @ 08:25 PM
    Location
    Just North of Fort Benning
    Posts
    503
    Real Name
    Roger
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    12:38 PM
    The "hard shinny" finish is why we don't use BLOicon. RLO leaves a dull finish that is not hard or slick when wet. Once BLOicon is on a stock, you can not put RLO on it. To me, a stock with BLO is ruined as a collector stock. As a shooter, BLO protects the wood better than RLO.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Legacy Member imarangemaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-13-2025 @ 11:11 AM
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,353
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    11:38 AM
    Thread Starter
    The stock has the same finish as when I got it. It was NOT a RLO finish, as it was already hard and shiny. The Inland is all original as left the factory, with 95% finish metal, and the stock appears to be original to the weapon. I have no idea of when it acquired its current finish, and could really care less. I have had stocks with the RLO finish, and I know what they are like (like the CMPicon Inland I had). I did not strip it, but rather cleaned it with a wipe down of 50/50 mix. Whatever "collector value" may have been ruined, was already done before I got it.... In my mind, stripping the finish to re-finish it with BLOicon takes away from its originality as I received it.

  5. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Johnny Peppers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-01-2015 @ 11:25 PM
    Posts
    1,810
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    11:38 AM
    The stock finish doesn't have to be the same as the military contractors used, as you can't apply it the same way they did. If you want the stock to appear original, what you are trying to do is duplicate the appearance of finish that was originally applied. So far the 50/50 BLOicon/Turpentine does that better than anything I have found. The original military finish was not a built up finish, and original stocks show open grain.

    This is the right side of any original 5.4 million Inland showing the acceptance mark. You can see the open grain in the photo.


  6. #5
    Legacy Member Bubba-7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-27-2023 @ 08:25 PM
    Location
    Just North of Fort Benning
    Posts
    503
    Real Name
    Roger
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    12:38 PM
    Ima,
    I understand you cleaned up a well used stock and put BLOicon on it. I understand it could have had BLOicon before. If I remember right, you asked what to use. I replied and the last post explains why I responded as I did. I said BLO does treat a stock better. It is just not right for a carbine.
    As a funny note, I bought one of those "white bag" 6.4 Winchester carbines from 2003. It was not cheap, don't you know. Those stocks were very dry from storage since 1955 and many were collector grade. When I received carbine, the stock was freshly oiled but did not feel, smell right. I knew it was not BLO but not right for RLO either. I asked the seller what he used, and he proudly said, "Syntec". I wanted to puke. Since then, every chance I have, I try to promote the use of RLO on carbine stocks. For every one person who posts, there are a hundred reading and many of those doing.
    I do not want to think of how many collector grade stock have had BLO put on them since 2003. I have been there, thinking you were doing right but really doing wrong. There is no way I will throw a stone.

  7. Thank You to Bubba-7 For This Useful Post:


  8. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Johnny Peppers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-01-2015 @ 11:25 PM
    Posts
    1,810
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    11:38 AM
    Maybe some have found a way to use RLO. bit most people using RLO will end up with a sticky mess. The BLOicon/Turpentine exactly duplicates the appearance of the original finish, and dries overnight. There is no one correct way to do it, and the best way is the one that works for each individual.

  9. #7
    Legacy Member Bubba-7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-27-2023 @ 08:25 PM
    Location
    Just North of Fort Benning
    Posts
    503
    Real Name
    Roger
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    12:38 PM



    The hard finish from BLOicon is not right. It may look right and GI but not on a carbine. In using RLO put it on wait a few minutes and rub it off. The fresh oil will soften the old oil some and you will rub off dirt. It is almost like rubbing off all you put on. It is not easy as painting on a thick coat and let it dry.
    It is work. I use both a 50/50 mix for soaking in when needed to 100% RLO. Rub it on heavy, and as much time as you like, one minute to an hour or two. Them rub it off, hard. Any area where the finish has gotten thin, the RLO will soak in. In other areas it all will rub off and take some dirt with it. After you rub it down, put the metal back in. You are done.
    You will be left with a fresh oiled stock with open pores and a soft feel that your hand can sense. RLO does not dry. It either soaks in and is gone or you rub it off and it's gone. You are left with wood as the surface finish and not a shinny coat of whatever dried oil as the surface finish.
    This is the best explanation as I can do. I have ruined stocks with Tru-oil, tung oil, BLOicon. They may look good and/or I was happy with them after I did them, but now, it saddens me to see them. All that work just to ruin a stock. Please gentlemen, no more.
    Last edited by Bubba-7; 11-13-2012 at 07:38 PM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Swedish HVA m96 stock finish
    By ptf18 in forum The Restorer's Corner
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-03-2012, 02:00 AM
  2. type 30 stock finish
    By uhjohnson in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-26-2010, 01:51 PM
  3. Another stock finish question
    By Steve H. in N.Y. in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-16-2010, 09:54 AM
  4. new stock finish
    By hpcomp in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-14-2009, 11:48 PM
  5. Stock finish
    By cary m2a in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-08-2009, 08:41 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts