1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 15 of 15
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 03:00 PM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,546
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    10:06 AM
    I could well be wrong but I rather suspect that production lines would have been changed over to the later pattern as soon as it was practical & convenient to do so, & I would think that would have been most likely during the course of 1942. I took a look at a few of the early type fore ends in my garage & they are in the 20L's or lower (1942 mfr.).

    Hope that helps.

    ATB.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Roger Payne; 02-24-2013 at 06:44 PM. Reason: clarification.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Advisory Panel Brian Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    05-20-2025 @ 04:45 PM
    Location
    Edgefield, SC USA
    Posts
    4,119
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    05:06 AM
    I have a '42 date in the 18Lxxxx range with the later pattern forend.

  4. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 03:00 PM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,546
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    10:06 AM
    Thx Brian. I guess there must have been multiple machines turning them out & not all would have been changed at exactly the same time. No doubt it would have occurred when it was least disruptive to production to do so.

  6. Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    06-06-2025 @ 12:18 PM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,667
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    10:06 AM
    I have said this several times on the forum that I learned during the production engineering phase at Uni during a spell at Pressed Steel in Swindon, that changes during production are never as simple as just switching off one machining process or just leaving the tool station empty or......... You get my drift. So on something like the fore-ends, where there were probably several lines and several sub contractors to deal with, it was a case of stopping production at one plant for a few days to do the change-over then gearing up to full production again befrore even attempting to start the next one and so on. So it could take many months of faffing around*.
    *(Faffing around....... A technical expression used by REME Warrant Officers to junior ranking men when it is not exactly clear just what they're doing or if they're actually doing something or doing anything remotely useful or whatever it is, is just seems to be a complete waste of time. Used by REME Officers to Warrant Officers when asking for an explanation of someones inability to just get the bloody job a) done - and b), on time)

    I always recall the textbook example used as a lesson plan about the updating of badges on MGB GT tailgates.

  8. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  9. #5
    Advisory Panel Brian Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    05-20-2025 @ 04:45 PM
    Location
    Edgefield, SC USA
    Posts
    4,119
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    05:06 AM
    Long Branch production rifles are pretty easy to ascertain as factory original up until 1944 when they stopped serial numbering the forends. The '42 rifle mentioned is one of the South African owned rifles as imported by Interarms in the early 90's and it's unaltered except for storage dings and dents in the woodwork. It's still greasy as I haven't ever stripped and cleaned it except for the barrel of course. Rog, your 20L changeover guess appears to be spot on. You can bet there was plenty of cross over. Nothing is ever cut and dried as some collectors want to believe. Peter's post says it all.

  10. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Another No.4 foreend question
    By bow in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-27-2012, 10:58 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts