+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: is it better

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Jerome Cooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-26-2014 @ 11:04 PM
    Posts
    55
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    03:20 AM

    Crimping

    Crimping is sometimes a necessary evil to prevent bullet movement under recoil or if here is a possibility of the bullet telescoping when feeding. It should be kept to a minimum...just enough to get the job done, for it cold works the mouth of the case and shortens case life. In cartridges that seat on the case mouth a taper crimp is usually applied, but not enough to interfere with the seating. Cases should be kept to uniform lengths so that dies apply the best and the desired amount of crimp. J.Cooper
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Gun Surfer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-19-2016 @ 08:20 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    247
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    02:20 AM
    Been shooting M1Aicon, AR15 and M1 for a quite a while, using match and military style BT bullets without crimping. I have also periodically checked reloads cycled into the chamber with a calipers for all three, never noted any change in OAL. All brass used was properly sized and in good condition. I'll keep testing but do not anticipate any problems.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    04-25-2025 @ 08:59 PM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,281
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    05:20 PM
    One of the "cute" features of the Garandicon is that the cartridge is almost exclusively guided into the chamber by "control" surfaces that bear on the case, not the bullet.

    Back in the "good-old-days", I would test for component wear / distortion in the feed mech. by feeding sized, empty cases from a clip.

    M-14s are pretty good, too.

    In the AR-15, the bullet DOES play a part, hence all the fooling around over the years, with the "bullet guides" in the barrel extension. The M4 Carbine introduced deeper bullet guides that actually extend into the alloy structure of the lower receiver. M-4s, have a shorter barrel AND a gas port MUCH closer to the breech. Not only that, but the buffer tube (and hence bolt travel) is shorter and the buffer is (was??) lighter. Thus the entire cycle runs a different set of pressures AND timings from a "full-sized" A2 or A3.

    That said, pretty much all of the feed failures I have ever seen on the AR platform involved faulty ammo, a fouled weapon, a faulty mag, or a combination thereof. This includes a LOT of shooting with soft and hollow-point "sporting" projectiles.

  5. Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts