+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: While not a a militray no4 stock (I assume) Im left wondering.

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    villiers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    01-08-2017 @ 08:32 AM
    Location
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Posts
    1,084
    Real Name
    xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    So what is the inlet at the front for?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    06-06-2025 @ 12:18 PM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,667
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    09:54 AM
    It's for an internally stepped hand stop rail and/or a set of stout wire legs. I suppose you could fix a bipod to it as well. Or if you shoot at the speed some of the competition target shooters seem to shoot at, you could fit some tea/coffee making kit into it too

  3. Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Contributing Member
    bigduke6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    05-24-2025 @ 06:32 PM
    Location
    North West England,UK
    Posts
    3,312
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    09:54 AM
    One thing to remember the T4 name seemed to carry over on all kind of every day conversions of the no4 and have never had anything to do with PH, I,ve seen many described as T4,s but are just another average heavy barreled No4 action.

  5. #4
    Advisory Panel Thunderbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    06-07-2025 @ 01:20 PM
    Posts
    1,150
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    09:54 AM
    Parker Hale made the T4, and AJ Parker made the identical "Excel" target rifle. AJP even used PH barrels marked "Parker Hale T4"!

    About the only way you can tell T4 and Excels apart is that Parker Hale linished the actions and applied a new number, whereas AJP rifles retain the original No4 markings.

    Actually, they're pretty good target rifles - probably easily good enough for the 90% of shooters who'd struggle to get better scores with an expensive modern TR rifle.....



    (cough)..... I just happen to have a few T4s and Excels for sale this weekend at the IHAM arms fair at Bisley. Actually, they're mostly commission sales or other peoples' rifles, so I'm not peddling my own tat this time.


    Last edited by Thunderbox; 07-03-2014 at 01:12 PM.

  6. Thank You to Thunderbox For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ssj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last On
    11-13-2017 @ 01:21 PM
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    651
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    09:54 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Thunderbox View Post
    Parker Hale made the T4, and AJ Parker made the identical "Excel" target rifle. AJP even used PH barrels marked "Parker Hale T4"!

    About the only way you can tell T4 and Excels apart is that Parker Hale linished the actions and applied a new number, whereas AJP rifles retain the original No4 markings.

    Actually, they're pretty good target rifles - probably easily good enough for the 90% of shooters who'd struggle to get better scores with an expensive modern TR rifle.....



    (cough)..... I just happen to have a few T4s and Excels for sale this weekend at the IHAM arms fair at Bisley. Actually, they're mostly commission sales or other peoples' rifles, so I'm not peddling my own tat this time.


    https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...09734965-1.jpg
    Sadly not in NZicon



    Oh well...

    What sort of $s do they go for?

    ---------- Post added at 09:42 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:39 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Mk VII View Post
    It was a piece of eyewash, and most people used the P-H equivalent with just a short screw through the left pivot and didn't seem to notice any defect.
    My club has got several of these Excels, which they want to dispose of. Hardly anyone does centrefire rifle now, and those who do own their own gun.
    The inletting will be for a handstop rail. I had an Anschutz rail put in my Mauser conversion.
    Send them to NZ



    ---------- Post added at 09:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:42 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Laidlericon View Post
    Reminds me of the Sterling and Enfield blurb for their conversion of No4 to 7.62mm. They implied that fitting a new barrel could be achieved with no special tools etc etc and that the accuracy wouldn't be affected (oh no......!) and even CHS would remain the same! Quite how that would/could happen is quite beyond me
    I odnt know how heavily the conversions were used elsewhere but a few NZers who had them said the actions tended to stretch. Since teh L42s seemed to last a long time Im left wondering what loopy 308w loads NZers were trying!

  8. #6
    Contributing Member
    bigduke6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    05-24-2025 @ 06:32 PM
    Location
    North West England,UK
    Posts
    3,312
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    09:54 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Thunderbox View Post
    Actually, they're pretty good target rifles - probably easily good enough for the 90% of shooters who'd struggle to get better scores with an expensive modern TR rifle.....
    I was going to mention your name TB in post #13, as someone who probably had a few etc. As for the above statement if we included other rifles from that era I,d say 98%.......

  9. #7
    Advisory Panel Thunderbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    06-07-2025 @ 01:20 PM
    Posts
    1,150
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    09:54 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by bigduke6 View Post
    if we included other rifles from that era I,d say 98%.......

    Going off thread slightly, today at Bisley I popped down to the zero range to check a tatty old P14 tgt rifle I'd picked up at auction - I paid more or less for the TZ 4/47 sight attached to it. Along with the T4s, no-one has taken an interest in it at the arms fair today.


    First surprise: far from being shot out, it printed two nice tight raspberries, spot on the 200 and 600 yard sight settings. The ammo was 1969 RG! The bloke next to me was using a top end tgt rifle, RWS ammo - and had a zero target looking like a shotgun had fired BB at it...


    Second surprise: some old boy also down at the range said "I made the stock for that rifle" (my P14). I'm ashamed I missed his name, but turns out he was the chap who produced stocks for Fultons and many of the other gunmakers. Looking at my rifle, he pointed out the detailing on the cheekpiece and thumb rest, and said that this was one of his early stocks - "before 1965"! Blimey, Bisley certainly is a small world, when you can turn up with a random 50-year old rifle and some bloke says, "oh, I made that one"...


    So, 50-year old target rifle firing 45-year old ammunition puts up a decent showing against someone using a £5k rifle and current RWS target ammo...

  10. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Thunderbox For This Useful Post:


  11. #8
    Contributing Member
    bigduke6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    05-24-2025 @ 06:32 PM
    Location
    North West England,UK
    Posts
    3,312
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    09:54 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Thunderbox View Post
    So, 50-year old target rifle firing 45-year old ammunition puts up a decent showing against someone using a £5k rifle and current RWS target ammo...
    It proves the old saying "Plenty a good tune played on an old fiddle"

  12. #9
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    06-06-2025 @ 12:18 PM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,667
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    09:54 AM
    Last sentence commencing 'Excell rifles with...' and ending '...on 7.62 rifles' I'd like to know the mechanics of that statement, how a full length rear-sight retaining screw over a short screw threaded into the sight gives '......the recoil restraint essential on 7.62mm rifles.

    Maybe advertising standards were a little more relaxed then or just tooooooo ambiguous to be questioned.

    But these rifles go some way to asking another question. Why is it that we hear about all these san fandanglio all singing and dancing replacement trigger mechanisms, when these superb but overpriced rifles were still VERY competitive with a properly set up bog standard off the shelf mechanism

  13. Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  14. #10
    Legacy Member Mk VII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    06-07-2025 @ 02:31 PM
    Location
    England
    Age
    63
    Posts
    1,436
    Real Name
    James West
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    09:54 AM
    It was a piece of eyewash, and most people used the P-H equivalent with just a short screw through the left pivot and didn't seem to notice any defect.
    My club has got several of these Excels, which they want to dispose of. Hardly anyone does centrefire rifle now, and those who do own their own gun.
    The inletting will be for a handstop rail. I had an Anschutz rail put in my Mauser conversion.

  15. Thank You to Mk VII For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Just wondering.....
    By 2AD_Vet in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 09-26-2011, 07:38 PM
  2. Just wondering.........
    By Bruce_in_Oz in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-29-2011, 01:06 AM
  3. Just wondering.........
    By Bruce_in_Oz in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-17-2011, 12:06 AM
  4. Something I've been wondering about
    By Rumpelhardt in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-15-2010, 08:26 PM
  5. Should I assume this front sight on Jungle Carbine is not original
    By gerry in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-06-2009, 10:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts