Scope on a LE No. 5

[RobD]

Simon, yes, you are talking about Maurice K. and he certainly enjoys shooting his 4T / No 5. It's in 7.62 and was re-barrelled by Phil Rose a couple years ago.

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[Peter Laidler]

I seem to remember converting his telescope to 7.62/metric

[CINDERS]

Just a question from me to satisfy my learnings of such stuff, why is the rear tie plate missing from the lower stock was this the norm in a mofiied No.5.
I too would be mindful of copping a Weatherby eye brow, I had a chap mention to me heaps he knew how to shoot as we were playing around with my 444 Marlin topped with a Weaver wide view scope using some pretty stiff loads (Max) he kept badgering me about having a shot of it. I relented as he knew it all so I loaded a round into the mag and let him loose with a shot, despite my constant warnings about its nasty recoil he would not give himself the correct eye relief.
I reckon he left himself less than 1/2" (must have been looking down a tunnel) anyway bang it goes skin and claret all over the place and 4 stitches in his eyebrow, yes he knew it all alright.

[villiers]

Done that (it hurt). But the LE seems fine with plenty of space in between eye and scope. PL very kindly sent me the wherewithall to convert the trigger and I found a No. 4 Mk 2 fore-end that I converted. Put a new coat of linseed on the wood, Blancoed and Brassoed the sling and am now ready for Sat at the range. Might then try out a Kahles 4i with the Canadian mount.

[villiers]

Found a range that was open over Christmas! Only 50 metres but it´s usually better at 100/300 than at 50. It (I) can hold the nine/ten for about twenty rounds (before it gets a bit hot ... and my eyes begin to wander off), and then it goes out to eight. I removed the bracket several times and it made no diffrerence. The scope is not too far back (no black eye, blood or bent nose) and I can´t see the need for a cheek rest. `Tis a GREAT improvement on the `smithless´ type! Am glad I chose the Trijicon 3-9x24 with the Triangle Post Reticle. It´s a bit large, but the only one with a one inch tube that´ll fit the bracket (so the illumination´s only got a half-life of fifteen years ... when I´ll be well over ninety).