Many thanks for the information Peter.Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
Many thanks for the information Peter.Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
There is a short article on the DP L59 rifles with pictures somewhere on the forum if you need ideas
Here are some pics of it.
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...ps9b1a2e81.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...ps2a71bf26.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...psd47a5ee5.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...ps105dcb25.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...ps16e28bd6.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...ps878260a5.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...ps67efdcfd.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...psa82f9212.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...ps2feeff8c.jpg
---------- Post added at 06:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:41 PM ----------
More pics.
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...psb233ccff.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...ps933da14a.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...ps48197824.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...ps285bda23.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...psa508b60f.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...psbab62463.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...psf0d21186.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...ps1eee1160.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...ps9e9997e8.jpg
http://i1343.photobucket.com/albums/...ps4567686d.jpg
Just looks like a DP from some nation deacted to the standard UKdeact spec to me but maybe one of the RFD's can say yea or nay. If it's to the spec then it's good to go regardless of whether it has a cert or not
Thanks Peter.
Hey I have one of those tool boxes ......( but with a lot less tools)
Do you get yours for free too?
Was it ever the case that rifles were marked as Drill Purpose not because of some mechanical defect(s), but because they were "obsolete" or simply no longer required for "active" service?
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same.
If you have a look in the library you'll see a long article on DP rifles (by Peter Laidler) - Here is an excerpt, but you need to read it all to get the full context.
"...........But, let’s say the DP stocks aren’t available, then authority will be issued FROM THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE no less, for such weapons to be made available. Ordnance stores would then select from returned weapons that are deemed to be ‘ZF’ (that’s an Armourers technical explanation that I won’t go into) or BER (Beyond Economic Repair) to select the required amount for conversion to DP specification.
Now, if the required amount cannot be made from the ZF and BER stocks, then the remainder will simply be converted from standard war stocks. You will see from this, that while on the face of it, some 30 years down the line that your bright and shining No1 or No4 rifle LOOKS bright and shining, under the bright and shiny surface might be lurking a metallurgical nightmare ……………… Let me give you an example........."
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
Tool box was free but..... James has taken my soul..........