+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: M1 carbine experts chime in. Im a newb

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 08:29 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,128
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    12:38 AM
    Neat little carbine, lots of features I haven't seem for years like the removable spring housing. Would that I cut stock have been a high wood to begin? Undoubtedly it's been through the mill but the fact remains it's a nice carbine. Some very nice features.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Regards, Jim

  2. #2
    Legacy Member southfork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last On
    02-23-2022 @ 07:52 PM
    Location
    Idaho Falls, Idaho
    Posts
    17
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    12:38 AM
    I like it, and wouldn't mind having it. Probably the main thing to know now would be the condition of the bore and muzzle. If those are in nice condition, the carbine would be worth $750 to $850 where I live (assuming it's not import marked on the bottom of the barrel). If it's import marked, probably about $100 less. Other parts of the country may value it differently. Oh, yeah: all Quality Hardware carbines have the recoil spring tube feature, so it's not a value adding feature for that carbine.

  3. #3
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    09:38 AM
    Well, it's a mixmaster. I am not a carbine expert, but know just about enough to say that the I-cut stock (early) does not go with the later style of stamped-frame backsight and the front barrel band for fitting a bayonet. You can see the very different levels of wear on the various components. In fact, the best advice I can give you is to get "US M1icon Carbines, Wartime Production" by Graig Riesch, which is quite comprehensive enough to enable you to make your own evaluation, and spend an interesting evening discovering just how many different manufacturers provide the parts for this carbine.

    As the configuration of parts varied over time, the most important item of information that you have not supplied is the receiver number. This, plus the book, will help you to sort out the parts that could have been on that rifle when it left the factory and those that must have been manufactured at a later date. And since not all manufacturers made all parts, but were supplied with some parts from other sources, it could be said that a great number of carbines left the factory as "mixmasters"! Personally, it wouldn't bother me much as a shooter, but collectors are very picky about such matters.

    Don't forget, the parts were supposed to be interchangeable between manufacturers, and, realistically, any armorer servicing a carbine would not have cared which manufacturer made any replacement parts. His responsibility was to make sure that the carbine worked, not to waste time matching up manufacturers parts for the delight of collectors 70 years later!

    As Southfork wrote: "Probably the main thing to know now would be the condition of the bore and muzzle."
    That is the essential question - does it work?
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 01-18-2015 at 04:31 PM.

  4. Thank You to Patrick Chadwick For This Useful Post:


  5. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    CrossedCannons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    08-20-2017 @ 08:56 AM
    Location
    Horse country, AZ
    Posts
    351
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    12:38 AM
    It looks like his receiver number is 4.7M which is very very late for QHMC. OP, screw the sight windage all the way over to the left and take a picture straight down onto the sight to show the staking pattern. Your IRCO sight might be original as they began to be used at the time QHMC made that receiver (and QHMC participated in the design of the stamped sight)

    One neat thing about Quality Hardware is they made none of the carbine's parts except (in most cases) the receiver

    IS THAT ROCKOLA BUTT PLATE EARLY OR LATE?
    Last edited by CrossedCannons; 01-18-2015 at 08:53 PM. Reason: Just wanna know

  6. #5
    Moderator
    (Deceased Nov 16th, 2019)

    JimF4M1s (Deceased)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-01-2025 @ 05:49 PM
    Location
    USA
    Age
    76
    Posts
    3,439
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    12:38 AM
    Looks alittle like a Saginaw butt plate? But is a match to the Riesch book pg 114 for Rock Ola.
    Last edited by JimF4M1s (Deceased); 01-19-2015 at 01:50 AM.

  7. #6
    Advisory Panel
    USGI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Age
    79
    Posts
    2,229
    Real Name
    Bob
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    12:38 AM
    Where's that "painter" guy when we need him? He's knows his Rockola butt plates. - Bob

  8. #7
    Advisory Panel
    painter777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Central Michigan
    Posts
    5,493
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    03:38 AM
    Bob,
    I believe the OP has the Mid-Late RMC Buttplate.
    Can't see it very well.

    Like this one........

    Cheers,
    Charlie-Painter777



  9. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to painter777 For This Useful Post:


  10. #8
    Advisory Panel
    USGI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Age
    79
    Posts
    2,229
    Real Name
    Bob
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    12:38 AM
    That's the one I was thinking about. - Bob

  11. #9
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 08:29 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,128
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    12:38 AM
    Also a wealth of info here...don't steer him to believe this is an original piece. It's been messed with.
    Regards, Jim

  12. #10
    Legacy Member DaveHH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-22-2024 @ 04:12 PM
    Location
    Northern Calif
    Posts
    1,348
    Real Name
    David Haynes
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    02:38 AM
    "Messed with" sounds harsh. It is a rebuilt carbine with the improved performance parts like most carbines found today. The Quality Hardware brand is not seen that often and the spring tube was the way QH made most of their guns. It is a nice carbine with character and probably worth a lot more than people would like. The handguard is probably worth $40 alone. Nice carbine to shoot and enjoy.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. what exactly am I looking at here. Newb to enfields
    By ghost_rider in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 01-10-2012, 11:51 AM
  2. newb member
    By cmecha in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-23-2011, 03:06 PM
  3. Any K11 experts ?
    By bigduke6 in forum Swiss Rifles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-21-2011, 05:46 PM
  4. Newb needs help with 03-A3 identity. (PIC HEAVY)
    By RaginCajun in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-26-2010, 12:17 PM
  5. looking for em1 experts?
    By tator62 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-22-2010, 11:41 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts