I'm with you on this Jim.Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
I'm with you on this Jim.Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
Why use a 50 pound bomb when a 500 pound bomb will do?
Remember also that some of the different Resistance groups did not really get along with each other. Some being communist motivated and other's not.
They obviously had to work together when the invasion came; but not alway's as easily as one might expect.
The truth is that the communists composed most of the resistance, however only AFTER the Germaninvasion of the USSR.
from 1939 thru late 1941 the Frenchcommunists sabotaged their own country and assisted the Germans (fellow socialists) wherever possible.
After the war the communists continued their campaign against their own country.
Last edited by Lee Enfield; 10-24-2017 at 12:48 PM.
I would be intrested in the Stens finish, not long from the factory untouched for 70 year, they look parkerized in the photos.
Would the grenades be relatively safe to handle provided that you didn't do anything obviously stupid with them like pull the pin out? Or, to put it another way, would the explosive filling have become unstable after 70 or more years and liable to explode by rough handling such as being dropped?
A very real possibility that you wouldn't want to even guess let alone bet on. That stuff can crystallize, liquify, nitrate, decay or just aquiesse...any of those ain't good. Normal action requires them to be stacked and blown as close to situ as possible to avoid dangerous handling. BUT!!! for the Stens involved, I'd manage. They'd still go away to a safe place(the grenades)...
Regards, Jim
In addition to aging of the explosives, I'd be concerned about the reliability of the fuse - normal delay or instantaneous detonation?